Back

AI-enabled proteomic profiling identifies interpretable diagnostic biomarkers for gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix

Zhu, T.; Huang, H.; Yang, Z.; Ni, M.; Xi, Y.; Liu, Y.; Luo, W.; Tang, X.; Fan, X.; Yang, C.; Shen, Z.; Wang, J.; Tang, H.; Weng, Q.

2026-06-26 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356417 medRxiv
Show abstract

Gastric-type adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (GAS) is a rare, aggressive cervical cancer unrelated to HPV infection that is frequently misdiagnosed because it closely resembles both benign cervical glands and HPV-related cervical adenocarcinoma. This diagnostic confusion can lead to inappropriate treatment, highlighting the need for objective molecular markers. Here, we performed the systematic multi-center proteomic analysis of GAS, profiling 407 cervical tissue samples to map its molecular landscape. To overcome limited sample size and biological noise, we developed WEDGE. First, generative AI synthesizes realistic artificial proteomic profiles to augment the training data. Biologically informed network analysis then leverages known biological relationships to surface diagnostically meaningful patterns. WEDGE identified a two-protein signature, Pepsinogen C (PGC) and DNA Methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), that distinguished GAS from HPV-related cervical cancer with 93% accuracy in the test cohort and 97% accuracy in an external proteomic cohort, outperforming existing biomarker-discovery methods. Tissue staining of an IHC validation cohort confirmed the expression patterns and reached a diagnostic accuracy of 87.9%. Beyond diagnosis, PGC independently predicted patient outcomes, and combining PGC with routine clinical features improved risk prediction (C-index 0.701). Together, these results establish an AI-driven framework for biomarker discovery and provide clinically relevant candidate tools for diagnosing and prognosticating for GAS.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.9%
2
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.1%
3
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.1%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.9%
5
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
10
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
11
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
12
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
13
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.2%
14
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.9%
15
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
17
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
19
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.5%
20
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.1%
22
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
23
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
25
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%