Back

Automating neoantigen selection for personalized cancer vaccine design

Yao, J. X.; Singhal, K.; Kiwala, S.; Schmidt, E.; Goedegebuure, S. P.; Miller, C. A.; Xia, H.; Cotto, K. C.; Coffman, A.; Hoang, M. H.; Khanfar, M.; Li, J.; Hendrickson, L.; Risch, I.; Davies, S. R.; Du, F.; Chang, G. S.; Hundal, J.; Ward, J. P.; Inabinett, W. B.; Hoos, W. A.; Johanns, T. M.; Dunn, G. P.; Pachynski, R. K.; Fehniger, T. A.; Foltz, J. A.; Gillanders, W. E.; Griffith, M.; Griffith, O. L.

2026-07-01 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.24.26356293 medRxiv
Show abstract

Advancements in immunogenomics and immuno-oncology have enabled the development of personalized cancer vaccines (PCVs) that target cancer cell-specific somatic variants. A subset of these variants produce neoantigens that, when presented on tumor cells by MHC molecules, have the potential to elicit a robust and specific immune response. To date, there are over one hundred interventional studies listed on clinicaltrials.gov that explore the use of PCVs. We have supported a number of these trials through the creation of bioinformatic pipelines, tools, and procedures for the identification of patient-specific neoantigen candidates. While many of these steps have been automated, the final selection of neoantigen candidates often relies on expert manual review, creating a bottleneck that limits scalability and full automation of PCV workflows. Addressing this challenge, we introduce NEAT (Neoantigen Evaluation & Automated Triage), a machine learning-based approach that enables automated neoantigen candidate prioritization and supports the transition toward more scalable and reproducible PCV design. We implemented a prediction model trained and tested on existing vaccine design results from 33 patients and 1,943 peptides, across 3 clinical trials, including 439 peptides prioritized for PCV inclusion. This model uses features such as tumor variant allele frequency, RNA expression, driver gene status, binding/presentation scores, and transcript support level to automatically predict whether a peptide will be accepted, rejected, or require further human review before inclusion in a vaccine. The model achieved a sensitivity of 0.847 and specificity of 0.924, with an area under the curve of 0.955. The model predictions have been incorporated in pVACtools version 7. By integrating this model into the vaccine development pipeline, we foresee a significant reduction in the time required to transition from patient sample collection to vaccine manufacturing, thereby enhancing the efficiency and scalability of PCV production.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Cancer Cell
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.7%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.6%
4
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.4%
5
Clinical Cancer Research
64 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
6
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
7
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 7%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
9
Cell Reports Medicine
153 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
10
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
Nature Cancer
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.7%
12
Cancer Immunology Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
13
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
14
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
16
Molecular Therapy
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
mAbs
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Cancer Research
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
22
The Journal of Immunology
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
25
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.8%
26
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
27
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 42%
0.8%
28
npj Vaccines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
30
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%