Short-term psychosocial outcomes following disclosure of glaucoma polygenic risk score (INSiGHT Study)
Maxwell, G. E.; Allen, R.; Hodge, L.; Kelley, S.; Craig, J. E.; Cohen-Woods, S.; Souzeau, E.
Show abstract
Early glaucoma detection and treatment are critical to prevent irreversible blindness. Glaucoma polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer an effective approach for stratifying disease risk and are increasingly available in clinical practice. However, the psychosocial impact of receiving glaucoma PRS results is currently unknown. As such, this study investigated short-term psychosocial outcomes of disclosing glaucoma PRS to individuals over 50 years from the general population. Individuals from the bottom 10%, middle 45 to 55%, and top 10% of PRS scores were invited to receive their results and complete surveys before and 2 weeks after receiving results to assess anxiety, test-related distress, decisional regret, recall and understanding. Of invited participants, 51.7% (136/263) enrolled with 133 completing both surveys. Two weeks after disclosure, PRS recall was high (78.2%), although PRS knowledge remained limited. Privacy concerns were moderate, not differing across PRS groups (X^2 = 4.17, p = .124). Small reductions in glaucoma-related anxiety (z = -2.93, p = .003), generalised anxiety (z = -3.75, p < .001) and stress (z = -2.49, p = .013) were observed following disclosure. While scores remained within normal ranges, higher glaucoma-related anxiety (t = -2.36, p = .020), higher negative emotions (X^2 = 20.80, p < .001), and lower positive experience (F = 5.70, p = .004) were seen for high-risk participants compared to lower-risk participants. Decisional regret was low and did not differ across PRS groups (X^2 = 0.28, p = .869). These findings support the psychosocial safety of glaucoma PRS testing while highlighting the need for improved education and longer-term follow-up to support clinical implementation.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic performance of multifocal photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram and optical coherence tomography in glaucoma 90%
- Short-term high-dose nicotinamide treatment across glaucoma subtypes reveals increased mtDNA content and minimal metabolomic change in blood 90%
- Quantification and image-derived phenotyping of retinal ganglion cell nuclei in the nee mouse model of congenital glaucoma 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Defining the Critical Educational Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: Views of US-Based Genetic Counselors and Medical Geneticists 89%
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website 89%
- Benefits and barriers to implementing precision preventive care: results of a national physician survey 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A step forward, but still inadequate: Australian health professionals’ views on the genetics and life insurance moratorium 92%
- EyeG2P: an automated variant filtering approach improves efficiency of diagnostic genomic testing for inherited ophthalmic disorders 90%
- A systems approach to enhance Lynch syndrome diagnosis through tumor testing 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Melanocortin-1 receptor (MC1R) genotypes do not correlate with size in two cohorts of medium-to-giant congenital melanocytic nevi 87%
- Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the Melanoma Research Community 86%
- Unsuspected consequences of synonymous and missense variants in OCA2 can be detected in blood cell RNA samples of patients with albinism 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- The evaluation of a web‐based tool for measuring the uncorrected visual acuity and refractive error in keratoconus eyes: a prospective open‐label method comparison study 93%
- Sociodemographic predictors of acute corneal hydrops in patients with unstable keratoconus 92%
- Automated 360-degree goniophotography with the NIDEK Gonioscope GS-1 for glaucoma 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.