Back

Force sharing between plantarflexor muscles in sheep during treadmill gait

Ross, S. A.; Schumacher, F. S.; Machado, E.; Sawatsky, A.; Leonard, T. R.; Hopfner, K.; Scott, W. M.; Bossuyt, F. M.; Taylor, W. R.; Herzog, W.

2026-06-24 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.06.23.734066 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Muscle force sharing during locomotion is influenced by the mechanical demands of movement and the contractile properties of synergistic muscles. In cats, plantarflexor muscles exhibit distinct functional specialization, with the slow-fibred soleus maintaining relatively constant force across conditions while faster muscles such as the plantaris and gastrocnemius increase force production with increasing locomotor demand. However, it remains unclear whether similar force-sharing patterns occur in larger animals with different musculoskeletal designs. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine force sharing between the superficial digital flexor (SDF) and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles during treadmill locomotion in sheep. Tendon buckle force transducers were surgically implanted on the SDF and MG tendons of seven sheep, and in vivo muscle forces were recorded during walking and trotting across different speeds and inclines. Both muscles increased force with increasing speed and incline; however, speed had a substantially greater effect than incline. The SDF consistently produced greater absolute force than the MG across all conditions, whereas the MG exhibited slightly larger relative increases in force with increasing speed. Time to peak force decreased with increasing speed in both muscles, although the SDF reached peak force later in stance than the MG across conditions. In contrast to the distinct specialization observed in cats, neither muscle displayed a relatively condition-independent, soleus-like force contribution. These findings suggest that force sharing in sheep is more distributed across synergistic muscles and may reflect the influence of musculoskeletal design, tendon compliance, and mixed fibre-type composition on muscle function in larger species.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.5%
2
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.6%
3
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
4
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.7%
5
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
6
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
8
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 30%
4.0%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
10
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.3%
11
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
13
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
15
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
16
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
17
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Human Movement Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
19
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
20
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
22
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
24
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
25
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
26
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
28
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
29
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%