Back

Sociality changes Gene Essentiality

Smith, E.; Humphrey, A.; Gurney, J.

2026-06-28 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.23.734044 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transposon insertion sequencing (Tn-seq) has become a powerful tool for assigning gene fitness and essentiality in bacteria, and has recently been extended to bacteriophages. A core but rarely examined assumption of these screens is that fitness is measured in an asocial environment, where each mutant succeeds or fails on its own. Yet many genes act socially: their products can be shared among neighbors, allowing defective mutants to be complemented in trans. In phages multiple genotypes routinely coinfect the same cell. Here we show that social interactions distort gene essentiality. Using paired quorum-sensing microarray and Tn-seq data from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, we find that quorum-sensing-regulated genes are over-represented among genes scored as non-essential, confirming that social genes are under-reported as essential. We then build a stochastic, agent-based model of phage Tn-seq across an MOI gradient, assigning each gene an intrinsic fitness effect and a complementation fraction. Complementable ("social") genes rise in frequency as MOI increases, masking their true fitness cost, whereas non-complementable ("private") genes, do not. Partitioning genes by life-cycle stage and applying a two-round high-then-low-MOI design, further separates gene functions by life cycle stage. We argue that deliberate MOI manipulation turns a confound into a tool, enabling systematic classification of phage sociality.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.3%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.2%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.2%
4
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.0%
5
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.3%
6
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.2%
7
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.6%
9
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
10
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 12%
3.1%
11
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
12
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.3%
13
Virus Evolution
155 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.0%
14
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.0%
15
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.8%
16
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
17
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.6%
18
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
19
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
20
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
24
Evolution Letters
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
25
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
26
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
28
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
29
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
30
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%