Back

Cognitive Control in Pediatric Cancer Survivors: A task-fMRI study

Nayak, S.; Nandi, S.; McKenna, F.; Henry, S.; Duong, T.

2026-06-29 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.23.734009 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background Chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment is a well-documented concern among cancer survivors, yet the neural mechanisms underlying deficits in cognitive control remain poorly understood. This study examined group differences in brain activation during a flanker task using functional MRI (fMRI) between chemotherapy-exposed participants and healthy controls. Methods Participants (21 survivors (24.9 years old; 71.4 % female; 15 years from diagnosis) and 21 healthy controls (26.7 years old; 61.9 % female) completed a flanker task during fMRI, with congruent and incongruent conditions. Reaction time, accuracy, and Flanker scores were collected. Whole-brain group comparisons were performed for congruent, incongruent, and incongruent > congruent contrasts. Associations between the incongruent > congruent contrast and cognitive performance were examined. Results Compared to controls, the Chemo group had longer reaction times in both congruent and incongruent conditions (p < .001) and lower NIH Flanker scores (p = .01), with no differences in accuracy. They showed reduced activation in the bilateral inferior frontal gyri, supplementary motor area, and bilateral caudate, but greater activation in the right inferior temporal and cerebellar regions. The incongruent > congruent contrast correlated with increased activation in the orbitofrontal cortex, inferior temporal gyri, and fusiform gyrus with cognitive performance. Conclusions Chemotherapy-exposed participants showed cognitive control deficits and altered neural activation during a flanker task, indicating disrupted recruitment of frontoparietal and subcortical regions key for conflict processing. These findings improve understanding of neural causes of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment and may help identify at-risk survivors and guide personalized rehabilitation.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
16.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 9%
7.2%
3
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.6%
4
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.5%
6
The Cerebellum
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.4%
7
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
8
Neuroscience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.3%
9
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.3%
10
Brain Imaging and Behavior
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
11
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
50% of probability mass above
12
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
13
Journal of Neurotrauma
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
14
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
15
Biological Psychology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
96 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.2%
20
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
21
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
24
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Pediatric Neurology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
26
Journal of Neuroscience Research
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
27
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
28
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Brain Research
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
30
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%