Back

Complex interplay of biomechanics and ecology influenced crab claw morphology evolution

Bicknell, R. D. C.; Wolfe, J. M.; Flynn, J. J.; Klompmaker, A. A.; Chase, M.; Fu, P.; Hopkins, M.

2026-06-23 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.23.733945 bioRxiv
Show abstract

True crabs (Brachyura) are among the most iconic marine arthropods, representing noteworthy examples of morphological and ecological disparity. A striking feature of brachyurans are their anterior pincer-like appendages: chelipeds. These structures showcase a large diversity of morphologies that reflect ecology and overall multifunctionality. Yet, a comprehensive assessment of appendage functional morphology within phylogenetic and ecological trait contexts has never been attempted. By combining 3D geometric morphometrics, finite element analyses, multilocus molecular phylogeny, and ecological trait data for 80 crab species, including three fossil forms, we unveil a complex evolutionary history for crab chelipeds. Despite extreme shape diversity amongst chelipeds, stress distributions are very similar across taxa and hint a many-to-one pattern. High concentrations of chelipeds within constrained morphospace regions associated with peak pinch forces illustrates that brachyuran morphologies optimised for shell crushing may have arisen in the Cretaceous. Deviations from this morphospace highlight the diversification of non-shell-crushing life modes and the influence of sexual selection on appendages. Neither cheliped shape nor pinch force show phylogenetic signal. Together these results indicate that the evolution of cheliped shape is closely associated with, and inferred to have been strongly influenced by, crab ecology, biomechanical needs and sexual selection. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTChelipeds, the pincer-like claws of crabs, are among the most morphologically diverse appendages within Arthropoda, yet the evolutionary forces driving this diversity remain poorly understood. By integrating 3D geometric morphometrics, biomechanical modelling, molecular phylogeny, and ecological data across 80 crab species including fossil forms, we demonstrate that cheliped morphology is driven by ecology, biomechanical demands, and sexual selection rather than phylogenetic relatedness. The multifunctionality of these structures produces strong evidence for many-to-one mapping of form to function. Morphologies optimised for durophagy appear to have originated in the Cretaceous, with subsequent diversification into manipulative and sexually selected forms from a morphologically flexible foundation. These findings demonstrate that cheliped diversity reflects a complex interplay between ecological specialisation, biomechanical optimisation, and sexual selection across Brachyura.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
17.8%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 16%
7.0%
3
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
5
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
6
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
7
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
9
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
10
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.5%
11
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 15%
2.3%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.0%
14
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
16
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.7%
17
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.6%
19
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
20
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
21
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
22
BMC Ecology and Evolution
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
23
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
25
Biological Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
26
Evolutionary Ecology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
27
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
28
Marine Ecology Progress Series
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
29
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.8%
30
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%