Back

The structure of a 2-MDa chloroplast RNA polymerase reveals unexpected evolutionary complexity

Schuller, S. K.; Collison, R.; Kumar, A.; Wun, C.-L.; Brillada, C.; Hoff, J.; Foteva, P. N.; Vetrano, P.; Kober, J.; Vries, S. D.; Irisarri, I.; Wang, L.; Gabel, C.; Bohn, S.; Ilieva, A.; Vries, J. D.; Schuller, J. M.; Ramundo, S.

2026-07-08 molecular biology
10.64898/2026.06.23.732312 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Transcription in chloroplasts depends on the Plastid-Encoded RNA polymerase (PEP), a bacterial-derived enzyme whose catalytic core remains encoded by the highly reduced genome inherited from the cyanobacterial ancestor. In land plants, PEP has roughly doubled in size, expanding into a [~]1 MDa multisubunit machinery through the acquisition of numerous nuclear-encoded subunits. Based on phylogenetic analyses, this added complexity has been widely attributed to the demands of plant terrestrialization. Contrary to this view, we show that in the unicellular green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, PEP assembles into an even larger [~]2 MDa complex containing twelve previously uncharacterized nuclear-encoded subunits (PEPS1-12), representing an RNA polymerase architecture of unprecedented size. A cryo-EM structure at 2.7 [A] resolution reveals that several of these subunits occupy positions analogous to those in land plant PEP, and that metabolic enzyme folds have been repurposed as structural scaffolds stabilizing the highly expanded plastid-encoded core. Despite this, most of the newly identified PEPS subunits lack detectable sequence or structural similarity to their land plant counterparts. These findings demonstrate that PEP complexity is not a hallmark of land plant evolution and may instead reflect, at least in part, the evolutionary entrenchment of additional subunits around an expanded plastid-encoded core. More broadly, they suggest that essential organellar machines can acquire substantial structural complexity that leaves little trace in sequence-based analyses, a pattern consistent with constructive neutral evolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.3%
2
Molecular Cell
350 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.6%
3
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 1%
9.6%
4
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 5%
7.8%
5
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
7
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.0%
8
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 8%
4.0%
9
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
10
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.4%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 42%
2.4%
12
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
13
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
17
Nature Genetics
286 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
20
Nature Cell Biology
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
22
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
23
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%
27
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%