Back

The Risk Estimation by the PREVENT equations and Clinical Outcome in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction.

Iwakura, K.; Tanaka, N.; Okada, M.; Nakagawa, A.; Tamaki, S.; Seo, M.; Yamada, T.; Yano, M.; Hayashi, T.; Yasumura, Y.; Nakagawa, Y.; Okada, K.; Sotomi, Y.; Hikoso, S.; Nakatani, D.; Sakata_, Y.

2026-06-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.23.26356391 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The PREVENT (Predicting Risk of CVD EVENTs) equations estimate the risk of incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) in primary prevention patients. We hypothesized that risk factors incorporated in the equations may be relevant to prognosis in heart failure (HF) and investigated the association between estimated CVD risk and clinical outcomes in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Methods: We estimated the 10-year CVD risk using the PREVENT equations in 278 patients hospitalized for acutely decompensated HFpEF (median 75 years, 51.4% male). We divided them into four groups according to the quartiles of estimated CVD risk and followed them to observe major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, HF hospitalization, and stroke. Results: MACE occurred in 125 patients (45.0%) over a median follow-up of 1,050 days. The estimated CVD risk classification was an independent predictor for MACE (p=0.02) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. There was a difference in MACE-free survival across the four quartile groups (p<0.001 by log-rank test), and the lowest CVD risk group had significantly lower MACE incidence than other groups. The estimated CVD risk provided incremental prognostic value beyond N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (C-index: 0.626 vs, P=0.009). The predictive value of the estimated CVD risk for MACE at 1 year was comparable to that of the MAGGIC score (AUC 0.676 vs. 0.639, p=0.42). Conclusions: The 10-year CVD risk estimated by the PREVENT equations had a moderate predictive value for MACE in patients hospitalized for HFpEF.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 17%
11.5%
2
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
7.6%
4
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.0%
5
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
6
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
7
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
9
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
11
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.1%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
13
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
14
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
15
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
16
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
17
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
18
eClinicalMedicine
77 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
19
Clinical Epidemiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.1%
21
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
22
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%