Back

Real-world uptake and outcomes of family screening in adults with thoracic aortopathy: a retrospective cohort study.

Pickard, M. M.; Potts, G. C.; Brown, M. C.; Belliveau, D. J.; Marcotte, L.; Foster, S.; Sullivan, J. A.; Herman, C.; Wood, J.; Matheson, K.; Horne, S. G.

2026-06-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.23.26356390 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Thoracic aortopathy is a disorder with genetic influence usually presenting in adulthood for which family screening is potentially desirable. Family screening is recommended, but the predictors of a positive screen and real-world pickup rates are unknown. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 1022 probands (first affected family member identified) with thoracic aortopathy and one or more features suggestive of a genetic etiology, and their presenting family members, assessed in a cardiac clinic (2009?2024). Imaging and genetic testing were employed in family screening. The prespecified outcomes were uptake and pickup rate of family screening, and proband and family member specific characteristics that predicted a positive family screen. Results: Among probands, 43.5% had one or more family member screened, with an average of 3 relatives per successful proband. 27.6% of family members screened positive. A pre-existing family history of aortopathy was the only variable predicting a higher incidence rate for positive family screen (p = 0.0003). Age of presentation < 60 was not predictive. For family members, extravascular features (p < 0.0001), closer relation to the proband (p < 0.02), male sex (p < 0.0001) and older age (p< 0.0001) all predicted a positive screen. Family members were eight times more likely to screen positive through imaging as compared to genetic testing. Probands with a genetic diagnosis of Marfan and Loeys Dietz syndromes accounted for only 4% of the total. Conclusions: Proband-initiated family screening for thoracic aortopathy has a high yield of affected individuals, even among older probands.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.4%
2
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 30%
5.1%
4
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
8
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.0%
9
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
10
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
12
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
14
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
18
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
19
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
21
Pulmonary Circulation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
22
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.0%
23
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
24
Journal of Internal Medicine
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
25
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.6%