Real-world uptake and outcomes of family screening in adults with thoracic aortopathy: a retrospective cohort study.
Pickard, M. M.; Potts, G. C.; Brown, M. C.; Belliveau, D. J.; Marcotte, L.; Foster, S.; Sullivan, J. A.; Herman, C.; Wood, J.; Matheson, K.; Horne, S. G.
Show abstract
Background: Thoracic aortopathy is a disorder with genetic influence usually presenting in adulthood for which family screening is potentially desirable. Family screening is recommended, but the predictors of a positive screen and real-world pickup rates are unknown. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of 1022 probands (first affected family member identified) with thoracic aortopathy and one or more features suggestive of a genetic etiology, and their presenting family members, assessed in a cardiac clinic (2009?2024). Imaging and genetic testing were employed in family screening. The prespecified outcomes were uptake and pickup rate of family screening, and proband and family member specific characteristics that predicted a positive family screen. Results: Among probands, 43.5% had one or more family member screened, with an average of 3 relatives per successful proband. 27.6% of family members screened positive. A pre-existing family history of aortopathy was the only variable predicting a higher incidence rate for positive family screen (p = 0.0003). Age of presentation < 60 was not predictive. For family members, extravascular features (p < 0.0001), closer relation to the proband (p < 0.02), male sex (p < 0.0001) and older age (p< 0.0001) all predicted a positive screen. Family members were eight times more likely to screen positive through imaging as compared to genetic testing. Probands with a genetic diagnosis of Marfan and Loeys Dietz syndromes accounted for only 4% of the total. Conclusions: Proband-initiated family screening for thoracic aortopathy has a high yield of affected individuals, even among older probands.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of an increased lifetime risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in UK Biobank participants with scoliosis 91%
- The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Cardiology Services 90%
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on rates of congenital heart disease procedures among children: Prospective cohort analyses of 26,270 procedures in 17,860 children using CVD-COVID-UK consortium record linkage data 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends in Gaps of Care for Congenital Heart Disease Patients: Implications for Social Determinants of Health and Child Opportunity Index 92%
- Predicting High-Risk Fetal Cardiac Disease Anticipated to Need Immediate Postnatal Stabilization and Intervention with Planned Pediatric Cardiac Operating Room Delivery 92%
- Right Heart Remodeling After Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Patients with Pulmonary Atresia or Critical Stenosis with Intact Ventricular Septum 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systematic disruption of zebrafish fibrillin genes identifies a translational zebrafish model for Marfan syndrome 93%
- Serum cFAS Content Correlates with Incidence of Peripheral Arterial Disease 92%
- Mendelian randomization suggests a causal link between glycemic traits and thoracic aortic structures and diseases 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and clinical importance of titin truncating variants in adults without known congestive heart failure 90%
- ClinGen Hereditary Cardiovascular Disease Gene Curation Expert Panel: Reappraisal of Genes associated with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy 90%
- Prevalence and Impact of Myocardial Injury in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Infection 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Standardized Data Elements for Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Consensus Report from the Pulmonary Embolism Research Collaborative 92%
- Prevalence of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Master Female Endurance Athletes 92%
- Second Heart Field-derived Cells Contribute to Angiotensin II-mediated Ascending Aortopathies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.