Back

Multi-task artificial intelligence annotation of echocardiographic images: a retrospective multi-cohort study

Sahashi, Y.; Choi, D.; Ieki, H.; Vukadinovic, M.; Rawlani, M.; Kwan, A. C.; Cheng, S.; Ouyang, D.

2026-06-25 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.23.26356383 medRxiv
Show abstract

Summary Background A comprehensive transthoracic echocardiogram involves the assessment of over 70 parameters, placing a substantial burden on sonographers and physicians for manual annotation with considerable inter-observer variability. Prior open-source segmentation models have largely addressed 2D B-mode ventricular function, leaving a gap in the spectral Doppler and atrial measurements required for valvular and diastolic assessment such as velocity-time integral (VTI) and atrial chamber size. Methods In this retrospective multi-cohort study, we developed EchoNet-Segmentation, comprehensive task-specific deep learning segmentation models for left and right atrial area and VTI Doppler measurements. Training used 186,712 sonographer-annotated images from 93,978 studies (56,855 patients) at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC). Performance was evaluated on a held-out CSMC test set, a CSMC temporal split, an external Kaiser Permanente Northern California cohort, and the public MIMIC-Echo dataset. Findings On the CSMC held-out test set, our AI models showed strong agreement with sonographer measurements, with R2 of 0.817-0.882 and mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.13-3.80 cm for automated VTI measurements, and R2 of 0.675-0.747 and MAE of 2.48-2.52 cm2 for left and right atrial area segmentation. Performance was consistently confirmed on the CSMC temporal split (VTI: R2 0.606-0.866, atrial area: R2 0.694-0.705) and on the KPNC external cohort (VTI: R2 0.575-0.859, atrial area: R2 0.803-0.876), on the MIMIC-Echo dataset. Robustness was demonstrated on a different vendor's machines and across subgroups. EchoNet-Segmentation outperformed an open-source medical image foundation model with bounding-box, point prompt configurations on R2, MAE, and Dice score on both held-out test dataset and MIMIC apical four-chamber data. Interpretation EchoNet-Segmentation is the first open-source framework that delivers accurate, generalizable automated measurement across several key routine echocardiographic parameters, supporting end-to-end automation of clinically important echocardiographic assessments. Public release of model weights, code, and demonstration tools can facilitate reproducibility, research use and clinical deployment.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.8%
2
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
15.2%
3
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 34%
3.2%
6
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.4%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.1%
10
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
11
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
13
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
16
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
18
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
21
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
24
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
25
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%