Back

Pharmacogenetic phenoconversion modeling of drug-drug-gene interactions on CYP2C19 activity: effects of comedication by genotype on escitalopram concentrations

Stingl, J. C.; Molden, E.; Hole, K.; Wollman, B.; Viviani, R.

2026-06-25 pharmacology and therapeutics
10.64898/2026.06.23.26356327 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background. Polypharmacy is an important source of phenoconversion caused by drug interactions potentially modulated by genetic variability. Aims. To develop a linear phenoconversion model for TDM data and provide quantitative estimates of drug-drug-gene interactions (DDGIs) in the pharmacogenetic phenotype groups of CYP2C19. Methods. Escitalopram TDM data in a large real-world sample (n=2,852) was analysed for phenoconversion of CYP2C19 activity. Co-medication was identified by reprocessing high-resolution mass-spectra (Orbitrap). We developed a statistical model to identify inhibition from co-medication in the CYP2C19 and in alternative elimination pathways. We extended the model to estimate the inhibition ensuing from individual co-medications, using a single model for all data to account for multiple co-medications and confounders simultaneously. A Bayesian approach allowed us to stabilize the fit and provide well-calibrated credibility intervals. Results. Reprocessing of TDM analyses identified 17 co-medications, which were shown to phenoconvert CYP2C19 activity proportionally to the activity in non-medicated phenotypes. Phenoconversion decreased the original CYP2C19 activity by about one third for a co-medication that corresponded to a 100% substrate of CYP2C19. The extent of CYP2C19 phenoconversion correlated strongly with the fractional contribution of CYP2C19 to the metabolism of the specific co-medication reported in the pharmacogenetic literature (R2=0.55) so long as the mechanism was competitive inhibition. Conclusion. We provide the statistical methodology to estimate phenoconversion from co-medication in TDM data and combine TDM and pharmacogenetic datasets in future studies aiming at establishing quantitative models of DDGIs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.5%
2
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.1%
3
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
4
Clinical and Translational Science
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.0%
7
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
8
Molecular Pharmacology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
11
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
14
Metabolites
53 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
15
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
16
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
17
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.0%
18
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
19
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
Pharmacology Research & Perspectives
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Pharmaceutics
24 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
22
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
23
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.6%
24
Biochemical Pharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%