A Natural Experiment Reveals Clinically Essential and Compliance-Driven Nursing Documentation
Fan, H.; Mugoya, R.; Finnegan, A.; Thate, J.; Jia, H.; Rossetti, S. C.; Yen, P.-Y.
Show abstract
Despite contributing substantially to clinician burnout, nursing documentation lacks empirical evidence distinguishing clinically essential from administratively driven documentation. Exploiting a COVID-19 documentation relaxation policy as a natural experiment, we analyzed 520,357 patient shifts from 36,321 patients in 54 inpatient units (2019 - 2022) using large language model-assisted flowsheet classification and structural equation modeling. When permitted, front-line nurses reliably distinguished two types of documentation: in acute care units, primary nurses reduced compliance-driven Cares & Safety documentation by 19% (106.4 to 86.2 entries, r = -0.19), while maintaining or increasing documentation directly relevant to respiratory management, with no impact on patient respiratory outcomes. Documentation intensity also co-varied with real-time patient deterioration, consistently across unit types (|{beta}| = 0.13 - 0.14). Together, these findings provide the first large-scale quantitative evidence distinguishing clinically essential documentation from compliance-driven documentation and demonstrate that targeted reduction of the latter is a viable strategy for alleviating documentation burden without compromising care quality for respiratory care management.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.