Back

Patient Perspectives on the Contributors to and Impact of Delayed ACL Injury Diagnosis: A Qualitative Study

Thomas, M.; Ayre, C.; Dobbin, N.; Hughes, T.

2026-07-01 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.06.23.26355683 medRxiv
Show abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are associated with physical, psychological and social consequences, yet diagnosis is often delayed. Existing research has focused on clinical and organisational contributors to delayed diagnosis, with limited attention on patient lived experiences of the diagnostic process. This study aimed to explore patient perspectives on the contributors to and impact of delayed ACL injury diagnosis. A qualitative study was conducted, informed by a critical realist perspective, using semi-structured interviews with ten UK-based adults who experienced a diagnostic delay exceeding three months following ACL injury. Data were analysed using codebook thematic analysis. Three interrelated themes were generated: understanding and interpreting the injury experience; navigating healthcare pathways and professional interactions; and the impact of delay, recovery and life disruption. Participants described early uncertainty, symptom normalisation and attempts to self-manage the injury, often influenced by competing work, study or family commitments. Delayed diagnosis was shaped by fragmented healthcare pathways, inconsistent advice, repeated consultations without progression and perceived dismissal of patient concerns. MRI and specialist consultations were commonly viewed as pivotal moments that validated the injury and diagnosis. Delayed diagnosis had substantial consequences extending beyond physical symptoms, including disrupted sport participation, altered occupational and parenting roles, psychological distress, and a perceived loss of time and opportunity. Diagnostic delay following ACL injury appears to arise through the interaction of patient decision making, clinical encounters and healthcare system constraints. Improving timely diagnosis may therefore require person-centred approaches that strengthen public awareness, support clearer communication and improve continuity and access within healthcare pathways.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.9%
2
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
19.4%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 12%
6.5%
4
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.4%
6
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.9%
7
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
77 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
8
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
9
Health Expectations
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
10
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
11
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.2%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
13
Emergency Medicine Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
14
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
15
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Gait & Posture
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
17
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
20
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
23
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.5%
24
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%