Back

Comprehension precedes production of a complex call sequence

Mason, S. L.; Ridley, A. R.

2026-06-28 animal behavior and cognition
10.64898/2026.06.22.733898 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Growing evidence of animals combining discrete, meaningful calls into sequences--a feature once thought unique to linguistic syntax--has presented the opportunity to investigate the evolutionary origins of syntactic communication. The arbitrary assignment of meaning to words marks an important step in human language evolution, and a necessary precursor to generating further meaning through sentences. Studying how other animals that produce call sequences learn the meaning of these signals could help shed light on how referentiality and semantic combinatoriality evolved. Given the presence of meaningful call sequences has only recently been revealed in several non-human animals, ontogenetic studies of the comprehension of these vocalisations are, to date, non-existent. Western Australian magpies (Gymnorhina tibicen dorsalis) combine discrete calls into a diverse array of call sequences. Recent evidence shows these sequences are socially learned, but the developmental stage at which fledglings respond correctly to them remains unstudied. We performed playbacks of a discrete alarm call and call sequence to fledglings over the course of their first 18 weeks out of the nest, identifying when they differentiate between the low-level disturbance associated with the discrete call and the high-grade aerial threat associated with the sequence. Fledglings showed immediate vigilance to both vocalisations but exhibited significantly greater vigilance and upward scanning following the sequence. Critically, fledglings showed this response to the sequence from the first week of testing, with no effect of age on the response to either vocalisation. These findings suggest that comprehension precedes production of sequences in magpies and that sequence meanings are either learned rapidly or have an innate basis. While further investigation is essential, this study offers the first empirical insight into the ontogenetic emergence of combinatorial comprehension in a non-human animal.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.6%
2
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 11%
9.6%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.7%
4
Animal Cognition
23 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
5
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.4%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 17%
5.4%
7
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 18%
3.2%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.3%
14
Developmental Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
15
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
16
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
18
Cognition
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
19
Journal of Experimental Biology
259 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
20
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
21
Behavioural Brain Research
77 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
22
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
23
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
25
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
26
Integrative Organismal Biology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
27
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
28
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
29
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
30
Biological Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%