Back

Modelling Plant Cortical Mictrotubules: Curvature Sensing from Bending Energy

Tian, T.;Macdonald, C.;Cytrynbaum, E.

2026-06-23 Developmental Biology
10.64898/2026.06.22.733854 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Within plant cells, the self-organization of cortical microtubules (MTs) into ordered arrays is an important process for directional growth. There is growing evidence that cortical MTs respond to cell shape and/or mechanical stresses in the cell wall, requiring in silico models on complicated surfaces to provide a complete understanding. Most models assume that MTs are directionally persistent, following geodesics of the surface. This ignores the expected tendency of these elastic filaments to minimize curvature. Our recent model incorporated minimization of MT curvature in cylindrical cells and found curvature to be significant in biasing the array organization. Here, we generalize to a larger class of surfaces, studying individual microtubule shapes to provide insights into the role of geometric cues and highlight differences with previous models that use the geodesic assumption. We first show that geodesic models, including current models with finite persistence lengths, exhibit an invariance across certain geometries, leading to biophysically counterintuitive results. Incorporating curvature minimization, we show the difficulties imposed by high-curvature cell edges, elucidating potential new roles of proteins in helping microtubules traverse edges. Lastly, we show that geometries with competing curvature cues result in diverse curves previously not considered. These results provide geometric intuition for how various cell geometries affect individual cortical microtubules, helping us to better understand the processes required for the establishment of microtubule arrays in broad contexts such as: bundles spanning adjacent cell faces in prism-like root and leaf epidermis cells, protruding geometries of trichome cells, and rounded surfaces such as confined protoplasts.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
11.8%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
7.8%
3
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
7.8%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
5
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
6
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 27%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 29%
4.0%
10
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.2%
11
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
12
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.2%
13
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
15
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
17
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
18
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Nature Physics
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Cytoskeleton
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
21
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
22
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
24
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
25
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
26
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.8%
27
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
28
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
Mathematical Biosciences
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.6%