Back

Genetic interaction approaches reveal emerging roles of innexins in development : Insights from a novel pannier–innexin-2 interaction during Drosophila embryogenesis

Bhandari, S.;Eckardt, F.;Bauer, R.

2026-06-23 Developmental Biology
10.64898/2026.06.22.733794 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Effective communication between cells is essential for the typical development and behaviour of an organism. In this context, gap junctions represent the most universally preserved components at cellular membranes of multicellular organisms, facilitating metabolic and electrical connections between cells. Disruptions in these junctions have been linked to various developmental abnormalities and pathological conditions in humans. The invertebrate gap junction proteins, referred to as innexins, exhibit conserved cellular and molecular mechanisms of functioning with their vertebrate counterparts, known as connexins. Consequently, they provide valuable means for studying and understanding the functions of gap junctions in development. In the Drosophila embryo, innexin-2 is expressed in the amnioserosa and ectoderm, where it is required for epithelial morphogenesis. Genetic depletion of innexin-2 results in cuticular defects and embryonic lethality. Pannier, a GATA family transcription factor, is a key regulator of dorsal tissue development in Drosophila and is expressed in the amnioserosa, dorsal ectoderm and the dorsal vessel during embryogenesis. Pannier mutants exhibit defects in dorsal closure, cuticle formation, and cardiac specification. Although substantial evidence from vertebrate systems indicate that connexin expression is regulated by transcription factors such as GATA4, Nkx2.5, Tbx2, Tbx3, and Tbx5, whether a similar regulatory relationship exists between these transcription factors and gap junction proteins in Drosophila remains unknown. In this study, we investigate how innexin mediated intercellular communication impacts pannier dependent morphogenetic processes during Drosophila embryogenesis.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
21.7%
2
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.8%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
6.2%
4
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.2%
5
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.1%
7
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Cell Death Discovery
58 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Cell Communication and Signaling
51 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
11
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.4%
12
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Open Biology
106 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
16
The FEBS Journal
93 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
18
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
EMBO Reports
263 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
20
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
21
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
76 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
23
Journal of Molecular Cell Biology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
24
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
25
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%