Back

Generalized Chargaff symmetry in codon usage across the tree of life

Fariselli, P.

2026-06-22 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.06.22.733775 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Codon usage bias is a central record of mutation, selection, drift, and translational constraints, but it is usually treated separately from generalized Chargaff symmetry, the tendency for words and their reverse complements to occur at similar frequencies in long DNA sequences. Here we ask whether codon usage contains a measurable reverse-complement component, and whether departures from that component can be quantified. We first avoided imposing reverse-complement symmetry. Instead, we exhaustively evaluated all nontrivial symbolic involutions (f(f(x)) = x) of the 64 codons, constructed from self-inverse nucleotide maps and self-inverse codon-position permutations. Across taxa, the reverse-complement transformation was the optimum, giving the highest median correlation between codon frequencies and transformed codon frequencies. Random and amino-acid-preserving reference models showed that the signal is not a generic property of codon profiles and is only partly explained by protein composition. Additional controls preserving amino-acid composition and matching GC3 in expectation showed that the observed reverse-complement correlation remains higher than expected from these constraints alone, and genus-level aggregation confirmed that the optimum is not driven by overrepresented genera. The symmetry breaks in a biologically ordered manner: the third, most degenerate codon position remains closest to the reverse-complement baseline, whereas the first position departs most strongly and the second is intermediate and lineage dependent. Taxonomic comparisons reveal broad and fine-scale heterogeneity in the degree of codon-level symmetry preservation. Together, these results show that codon usage can be quantified as a combination of reverse-complement preservation and position-, lineage-, and function-dependent departures from the GCT-associated compositional baseline, linking sequence-level symmetry, evolutionary mechanisms, and codon-level organization within a single measurable framework.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.1%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 2%
12.6%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 16%
11.7%
4
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
5.1%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.3%
7
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
8
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.0%
9
Systematic Biology
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.2%
10
BMC Evolutionary Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
14
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
15
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
16
Evolution
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.1%
18
Global Ecology and Biogeography
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 18%
1.0%
20
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
22
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
25
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
26
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.6%
27
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
28
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.6%
29
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%