Back

Beyond Averaging: Pleiotropic effects of Dry2.2 expose the evolution of growth bet-hedging in barley

Kurtz-Sohn, A.;Abdelhakim, L.;Be\'ery, A.;Prusty, M.;Panzarova, K.;Fridman, E.

2026-06-23 Plant Biology
10.64898/2026.06.22.733768 bioRxiv
Show abstract

RationaleDeveloping climate-resilient crops requires understanding the developmental and physiological mechanisms governing responses to unpredictable environmental stresses. While agricultural selection historically favored phenotypic uniformity, highly volatile conditions can favor risk-spreading "bet-hedging". However, because standard genetic mapping relies on shifting plot-level averages, loci controlling population-level variance remain cryptic. MethodsWe investigated the pleiotropic effects of the Dry2.2 quantitative trait locus (candidate gene HvCEN) using an allelic series of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. spontaneum) introgressions housed in distinct cultivated backgrounds, evaluated via high-resolution single-plant physiological phenotyping and mini-plot field trials. ResultsSpecific wild alleles confer robust developmental canalization under water limitation, maintain harvest traits, stabilize vascular lignification, and drive a uniform senescence escape strategy. Conversely, carriers of cultivated alleles deploy a bet-hedging strategy under stress, more than doubling inter-plant developmental variation (volume, maturity timing). This variance-driven strategy relies on epistatic interactions, rendering Dry2.2 invisible to traditional mean-centric GWAS plots. ConclusionImproving crop resilience in volatile climates requires expanding selection focus beyond static, plot-level averages to include the active genetic design of population-level variance strategies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
11.8%
2
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
11.8%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
10.9%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.4%
5
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
6
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.3%
8
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
BMC Plant Biology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
10
G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
12
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 14%
2.4%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
14
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.1%
15
The Plant Genome
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
16
The Plant Journal
215 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
The Plant Cell
161 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Nature Plants
94 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
19
Evolutionary Applications
108 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
20
Annals of Botany
50 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
22
Plant Biotechnology Journal
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
23
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
24
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
25
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
26
GENETICS
483 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
28
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%