Back

Mapping non-coding functional elements in allotetraploid Cyprinus carpio embryo development reveals subgenome variation of transcription regulation

Jimenez-Gonzalez, A.; Madrero Pardo, A.; Hadzhiev, Y.; Blasweiler, A.; Zunar, B.; Csenki-Bakos, Z.; Muller, T.; Megens, H.-J.; Wiegertjes, G. F.; Lenhard, B.; Baranasic, D.; Mueller, F.

2026-06-26 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.22.733679 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Common carp (Cyprinus carpio) is an important freshwater species for ornamental and aquaculture purposes, and a key cyprinid model for studying allotetraploidy. Its two chromosomally-separated subgenomes show distinct gene expression profiles, but how their regulatory landscapes control gene expression dynamics during development remains unknown. We generated a regulatory atlas by combining transcriptomes across 12 developmental stages with chromatin accessibility maps, transcription start sites and gene regulation-associated histone post-translational modifications. Subgenome-specific annotation and comparison of 254,276 developmental regulatory elements (PADREs) revealed that regulatory subgenome divergence is most prominent during early development, converging toward the phylotypic period, mirroring expression convergence between subgenomes at the same stages. This dynamic was driven by enhancers, while promoters maintained a more stable subgenome bias, extending the hourglass model of developmental constraint to allotetraploid subgenome regulation. Subgenome-specific enhancers were preferentially retained in subgenome B, whereas subgenome A shifted toward homeologous enhancer activity near the phylotypic stage, indicating directional regulatory divergence between subgenomes. Comparison with zebrafish revealed high concordance with sequence conservation and that subgenome B retained more ancestral cyprinid regulatory elements than subgenome A. This developmental regulatory atlas provides a foundational resource for investigating cis-regulatory evolution following the fourth round of vertebrate genome duplication.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.6%
3
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
12.4%
4
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.7%
5
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.8%
7
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.4%
9
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.1%
12
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
14
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.0%
17
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
PLOS Genetics
862 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.0%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
21
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
22
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 46%
0.6%
24
Journal of Genetics and Genomics
38 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.6%