Back

FateLimit quantifies the prediction horizon of cell fate

Sung, J.-Y.; Cheong, J.-H.

2026-06-23 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.22.733672 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-cell technologies have enabled increasingly detailed reconstruction of developmental trajectories, yet a fundamental question remains unresolved: when does future cellular identity become predictable from a cells current molecular state? Existing approaches infer lineage relationships, transition probabilities or future transcriptional dynamics, but do not directly quantify the emergence of fate predictability during cellular state transitions. Here we present FateLimit, an information-theoretic framework for measuring the temporal dynamics of cell-fate predictability from single-cell omics data. FateLimit combines probabilistic fate assignment, fate entropy and mutual information to quantify how information about future cellular outcomes is encoded in present molecular states. We introduce two quantitative descriptors: the Fate Information Half-Life (FIHL), which measures the characteristic timescale of fate-information dynamics, and the Prediction Horizon (PH), defined as the earliest developmental stage at which observed fate predictability exceeds the 95th percentile of a permutation-derived null distribution. We applied FateLimit across developmental, lineage-tracing and reprogramming systems, including pancreatic endocrinogenesis, CellTag reprogramming, human hematopoiesis and zebrafish embryogenesis. Across all datasets, FateLimit identified significant fate information and reproducible prediction horizons that were robust to cell-state representation, lineage structure and biological context. Comparative analysis revealed that prediction horizons differ substantially among cellular lineages, indicating that distinct developmental programs acquire predictive information at different rates. FateLimit establishes a general framework for quantifying the predictability of future cellular identity from present molecular states. By transforming developmental trajectories into predictability landscapes, FateLimit enables systematic comparison of commitment dynamics across biological systems and establishes prediction horizons as a quantitative measure of cell-fate determination.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 3%
27.1%
2
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.4%
3
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 6%
6.9%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 6%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 31%
3.3%
6
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 37%
2.8%
8
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
9
Nature Cell Biology
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
10
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
11
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.8%
13
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.5%
15
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.5%
16
Stem Cell Reports
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
17
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.1%
18
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
19
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
20
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
npj Systems Biology and Applications
125 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.9%
24
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%