Back

Robust neural face identity codes in the Super-Recogniser brain

Ventura, M.; Grootswagers, T.; Cottier, T.; Varlet, M.; Dunn, J. D.; White, D.; Quek, G. L.

2026-06-26 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.22.733666 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Super-Recognisers show exceptional ability in face recognition, providing a natural model of how perceptual systems optimise for individuating visually similar stimuli in variable viewing conditions. However, the neural representations supporting this extreme perceptual expertise are unknown. Here, we tested whether Super-Recognisers (n = 23) differed from typical recognisers (n = 21) in the dimensional organisation of neural face identity coding. We recorded 64-channel electroencephalography while participants viewed random and rapidly-presented sequences containing 10 naturally varying images of 40 unfamiliar identities. Using time-resolved representational similarity analysis we measured the geometry of identity representations, their consistency across observers, and how clearly they specified face identity. Although neural expression of identity information was robust in both groups, we found three key differences between Super-Recognisers and typical recognisers. First, the geometry of face identity representations differed between groups. Second, Super-Recognisers showed greater inter-individual consistency in representational geometry. Third, Super-Recognisers' neural signals discriminated between face identities more strongly than those of typical recognisers. Differences in the coding of broader face categories (sex, age, ethnicity) were notably weaker, suggesting that the observed group differences reflected fine-scale differences in identity coding rather than global reshaping of representational geometry. Strikingly, all three differences emerged within a common mid-latency interval (~300-500ms), implicating higher-stages of face processing associated with representations that are sensitive to face familiarity and link between perceptual and semantic domains. Together, these findings indicate that individual differences in face recognition ability reflect higher-level differences in neural identity coding, rather than enhanced early sensory processing.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 8%
11.4%
2
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.4%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.6%
4
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.0%
5
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.0%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.3%
7
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
9
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 9%
3.9%
10
Psychological Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Neuroscience of Consciousness
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
12
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.6%
13
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.3%
14
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
15
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.9%
17
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
19
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.6%
20
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
21
Journal of Vision
110 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
22
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
23
Psychophysiology
77 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
26
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
27
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.0%
28
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
29
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%