Differential COVID-19 Outcomes Across Lysosomal Disorders
Byer, B. K.; Butzin-Dozier, Z.; McGrath, B. M.; Muenzer, J.; Clarke, L.; Haendel, M. A.; O'Neil, S. T.
Show abstract
Background Lysosomal disorders (LDs) are a heterogeneous group of rare inherited disorders characterized by multi-system involvement and high comorbidity burden, which raises concerns about severe COVID-19 outcomes. Conversely, because SARS-CoV-2 relies on endolysosomal pathways for cellular entry and replication, certain LDs may exert a protective effect against viral pathogenesis. Prior clinical evidence investigating LDs and severe SARS-CoV-2 infection has been limited by small sample sizes and inconsistent findings. Therefore, to resolve these conflicting biological hypotheses and estimate population-level outcomes, we conducted a large-scale retrospective cohort study using nationwide U.S. harmonized electronic health record data from the National Clinical Cohort Collaborative (N3C). This design utilized longitudinal records starting January 1, 2018, to evaluate COVID-19 infections captured between January 1, 2020, and July 11, 2024. Results The study included 16,380 individuals, comprising 5,460 patients with lysosomal disorders and 10,920 matched controls. Patients with LDs had significantly higher odds of COVID-19 hospitalization compared with controls (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.70-2.04). Elevated odds were observed across the evaluated categories, but varied substantially. Notably, neurodegenerative LDs such as neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (OR = 9.32) and metachromatic leukodystrophy (OR = 2.33) remained associated with hospitalization after adjustment for comorbidities. Contrarily, the elevated odds for Fabry disease and Gaucher disease were no longer significant after adjustment. Mortality among hospitalized patients with LDs was comparable to that of matched controls (one-year survival: 82.1% vs 82.0%), suggesting that LD status does not independently worsen survival once hospitalization occurs. Conclusions Patients with LDs were at an increased odds of COVID-19 hospitalization, driven by a combination of elevated comorbidity burden and disorder-specific effects, which vary significantly across LD categories. This study clarifies that excess risk is concentrated in the transition to hospitalization. These patients may thus require personalized clinical care to mitigate the negative consequences of COVID-19.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A systematic analysis of the contribution of genetics to multimorbidity and comparisons with primary care data 93%
- Refinement of post-COVID condition core symptoms, subtypes, determinants, and health impacts: A cohort study integrating real-world data and patient-reported outcomes 91%
- Characterizing Long COVID: Deep Phenotype of a Complex Condition 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical outcomes among patients infected with Omicron (B.1.1.529) SARS-CoV-2 variant in southern California 94%
- Attributes and predictors of Long-COVID: analysis of COVID cases and their symptoms collected by the Covid Symptoms Study App 92%
- A Neanderthal OAS1 isoform Protects Against COVID-19 Susceptibility and Severity: Results from Mendelian Randomization and Case-Control Studies 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-omics identify LRRC15 as a COVID-19 severity predictor and persistent pro-thrombotic signals in convalescence 94%
- A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk 92%
- Increased vaccine sensitivity of an emerging SARS-CoV-2 variant 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Novel clinical subphenotypes in COVID-19: derivation, validation, prediction, temporal patterns, and interaction with social determinants of health 94%
- Finding Long-COVID: Temporal Topic Modeling of Electronic Health Records from the N3C and RECOVER Programs 93%
- Identifying clusters of people with Multiple Long-Term Conditions using Large Language Models: a population-based study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 90%
- Prevalence and Impact of Myocardial Injury in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Infection 88%
- Common variants near the bradykinin receptor B 2 gene are associated with angioedema induced by angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor treatment - a genome wide association study 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.