Back

Type 2 Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Comparative Analysis of Disease Trajectory and Clinical Outcomes

Bautista Neughebauer, A. A.; Tushak, Z.; Benza, R. L.; Talreja, D.

2026-06-25 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.22.26356266 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Approximately 40 million individuals in the US have diabetes, and 6.5 million are also afflicted with congestive heart failure (CHF). This paper outlines the natural history of CHF in T2DM and compares CHF outcomes between patients with and without T2DM. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2,008 patients hospitalized for CHF exacerbation between December 2016 and June 2019. Propensity score matching was used to match diabetics and nondiabetics. Outcomes included survival and readmission rates at 28 d, 3 mo and 6 mo, as well as comparison of echocardiographic findings. Results: A total of 2,008 patients were included. After matching, 492 patients were included, with 244 diabetics and 248 nondiabetics. After matching, readmission rates within 28 days (p=0.625) were not different, but there was a trend for higher readmission rates among diabetics at 3 months (29.3% vs. 21.5%, p=0.049) and 6 months (44.3% vs 35.8%, p=0.053). Echocardiographic characteristics, including LVEF (p=0.135), LV EDV (p=0.707), maximum velocity of mitral valve E wave (p=0.407), maximum velocity of mitral valve A wave (p=0.050), E/A ratio (p=0.501) and tricuspid valve regurgitation pressure (p=0.668) were not different in the two groups. However, tricuspid valve regurgitation velocity was higher in diabetics (3.1 vs 2.9, p=0.003). Conclusions: Although diabetes poses an additional burden for patients with CHF, survival is similar in diabetics and nondiabetics. Nonetheless, readmission rates may be higher among diabetics. Tricuspid return velocity is higher in diabetics, suggesting early pulmonary vasculature remodeling.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
14.7%
3
Open Heart
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
4
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.7%
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
50% of probability mass above
7
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.2%
8
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
10
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.1%
11
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
12
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.3%
13
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
15
Pulmonary Circulation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
16
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
19
Kidney360
22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
21
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
23
European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%