Back

Predicting Chemotherapy Response from Staging Laparoscopy Images

Schnelldorfer, T.; Castro, J.; Goldar-Najafi, A.; Nugent, F. W.; Gaikwad, B.

2026-06-24 oncology
10.64898/2026.06.22.26356226 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: For patients with metastatic gastrointestinal cancers, chemotherapy resistance is a common phenomenon that, if known in advance, would allow for individualized treatment decisions. This study aimed to test the feasibility of developing a deep learning computer vision system that uses laparoscopy images depicting peritoneal surface metastases (i.e., capturing the in-vivo optical appearance of metastases as a summary of their molecular makeup) to predict whether a patient is resistant to standard chemotherapy. Methods: The retrospective observational feasibility study included 35 adult patients who underwent staging laparoscopy for non-colon gastrointestinal adenocarcinoma with biopsy-confirmed peritoneal surface metastases and who underwent chemotherapy as their only treatment modality. Chemotherapy resistance was determined based on each patient's observed cancer-specific survival after controlling for confounders. Results: Of 35 patients, 17 were assigned to the chemotherapy sensitive group and 18 to the chemotherapy resistant group. The study cohort provided 1010 laparoscopy image patches of 101 biopsy-confirmed metastases. A densely connected convolutional neural network with cross-validation provided the best results for correctly predicting chemotherapy resistance at the patient level (accuracy 0.80 (95%CI 0.63-0.92), sensitivity 0.72, specificity 0.88, AUC-ROC 0.78). Saliency maps demonstrated the system's trustworthiness. Conclusion: In this study, a prototype surgical computer vision system designed to determine chemotherapy resistance from operative images of peritoneal surface metastases demonstrated its technical feasibility. Further development and validation in a multi-institutional clinical study are pending.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.9%
3
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
5
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.8%
6
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.4%
7
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
9
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
10
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
11
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
12
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
13
npj Precision Oncology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
14
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
15
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
16
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 17%
1.1%
19
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
21
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
22
European Journal of Cancer
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
23
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
24
Cureus
68 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
25
JAMA Network Open
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
26
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
27
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%