Back

Reducing stillbirth in high burden settings using biomarkers and ultrasound technologies: protocol for the multi-centre prospective iTECH cohort study

Ali, S.; Nakato, W.; Tumuhamye, J.; Nabweyambo, S.; Sande, O. J.; Bisoborwa, R. M.; Ganzevoort, W.; Gordijn, S. J.; Rijken, M. J.; Grobusch, K. K.; Byamugisha, J.; Papageorghiou, A. T.

2026-06-24 obstetrics and gynecology
10.64898/2026.06.22.26356223 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction Stillbirth prevention requires reliable detection of potential causes for timely interventions. Currently, there is no effective screening strategy to identify fetuses at risk of stillbirth. Prognostic models have been proposed as a potential solution, but there is a shortage of robust, clinically applicable models in low- and middle-income countries. Early birth is frequently initiated without proper risk stratification, leading to increased neonatal and infant morbidity and mortality. This study aims to develop and validate multi modal multivariable prediction models for stillbirth and pathologies that lead to stillbirth (preeclampsia & fetal growth restriction) using widely accessible and cost-effective markers. Stakeholder perspectives will also be assessed. Methods and analysis This multi-center prospective cohort study is running in four high volume regional referral hospitals in Uganda: Kawempe, Hoima, Lira, and Mbale. We will enroll at least 6,075 pregnant women attending routine antenatal care (ANC), above 13 years of age, and greater than or equal to11 weeks of gestation. Data and biological samples will be collected at 11-23 weeks, 35-37 weeks and at birth in all women. In a subset of women, additional measurements will be obtained between 24-34 weeks and 38-42 weeks to allow for spread of the data across the full spectrum of pregnancy. This data will enable us to investigate the physiological changes with gestational development in healthy or unhealthy pregnancies, to guide future monitoring and management of women and establishment of reference values for novel markers. The placenta will be collected for histopathological analysis in women diagnosed with intrauterine fetal demise at greater than or equal to 20 weeks of gestation, stillbirth nearmiss and their corresponding controls. Data on socio-demographics, obstetric history, current pregnancy conditions, and tests such as maternal hemodynamics, ultrasound, and biochemical markers will be collected from each participant, and used to develop regression and machine learning prediction models. Models will be validated and evaluated by comparing their calibration plots, precision and recall, F1 scores and accuracy, aiming for less complexity and reliable predictions. Emerging models will be translated into software as a medical device (SAMD), while taking into account user experiences, regulatory requirements, data pipelines in clinical workflows and user-friendly interfaces that facilitate access and the interpretation of outputs, to allow for seamless integration into existing electronic health information systems and decision support tools. To assess stakeholder perceptions, we will employ an exploratory qualitative component using focus group discussions, semi-structured and key informant interviews. The sample will include 81 purposively selected women and their partners who use maternity care services, local leaders and healthcare providers in and out of the four hospitals implementing iTECH in Uganda. Qualitative data will be audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis performed using Nvivo 12.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
22.9%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.3%
3
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.7%
5
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
6
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
7
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
8
Journal of Clinical Pathology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
BMJ Open Quality
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
10
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
11
International Journal of Medical Informatics
26 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
12
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
13
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
14
JAMIA Open
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%
16
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.5%
17
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
18
Healthcare
17 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
19
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
20
Frontiers in Digital Health
24 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
22
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.5%