Back

Utility of genetic screening for the prediction of severe arrhythmic outcomes in mitral valve prolapse

Jhawar, R.; Cristin, L.; Small, A.; Bibby, D.; Tastet, L.; Rich, A.; Delling, F. N.

2026-06-24 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.06.22.26356215 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Cardiomyopathy and channelopathy (CC) gene variants have been linked to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) or death (SCD) in small, selected pedigree or post-mortem studies of arrhythmic mitral valve prolapse (MVP). However, the utility of clinical whole exome sequencing (WES) panels as a risk stratification tool in unselected MVP samples is unknown. Objectives: The goal of the study was to test the utility of clinical WES panels with CC variant screening for arrhythmic risk stratification in MVP. Methods: We performed research based WES in 203 consecutive MVPs without other arrhythmic substrate. Variants were filtered for rare (<0.1%) and protein altering variants in 157 CC genes within an existing clinical panel and annotated with a clinical significance predictor. Overall frequency of CC variants was compared to a sample of general population exomes from gnomad v4.1.0. We assessed a composite severe arrhythmic outcome of SCD or frequent ectopy/ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation/SCA requiring catheter ablation or defibrillator implantation, respectively. Results: CC variants were more common in MVPs compared to the general population (RR: 4.3, p < 0.01). Pathogenic/Likely Pathogenic (P/LP) variants were identified in 18 MVPs (9%; 8 CC variants among 12 genes). P/LP variants were independently associated with the composite arrhythmic outcome after adjustment for traditional imaging parameters of risk including mitral annular disjunction and bileaflet involvement (OR: 1.23 [95% CI: 1.03 to 1.47], p = 0.01). P/LP variant carriers were at greater arrhythmic risk in time to event analyses starting at birth (HR: 2.87 [95% CI: 1.24 to 6.62], p = 0.01). Conclusions: A subset of MVPs with P/LP variants in CC genes are at higher arrhythmic risk. A clinical WES panel inclusive of CC variants may represent a valuable arrhythmic risk stratification tool in MVP beyond traditional imaging parameters.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
30.9%
2
Circulation
74 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
European Heart Journal
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.4%
5
Heart Rhythm
23 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
7
Heart
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
9
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.9%
12
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.1%
14
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.1%
15
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
16
JACC: Basic to Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 74%
0.8%
20
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
18 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
International Journal of Cardiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%