Back

Who funds stroke trials in Europe? A survey of funding sources for randomised controlled stroke trials by the European Stroke Organisation Trials Alliance (ESOTA) network

Agarwal, S.; Olivot, J. M.; Roffe, C.; Knoflach, M.

2026-06-24 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.22.26356203 medRxiv
Show abstract

Abstract Aims and scope Evidence from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) has transformed stroke care. There are no systematically collected data on the amount of public funding, critical to delivering trials, going into stroke RCTs. To understand the extent of stroke RCT funding by national and EU funding bodies across Europe, the European Stroke Organisation Trials Alliance (ESOTA) conducted a survey of its member nations. Methods This is an observational study of research funding in Europe. The ESOTA steering group sent an electronic survey to the leads of the 16 participating national networks from 14 countries. Structured survey questions included who the funding bodies were in each country, the number of RCT applications put forward for public national or EU funding, the number of successful and failed applications, and the amount of funding granted between 01/01/2022 and 31/12/2023. Results Responses were received from 13 of 14 participating countries. There was significant variation in the number of grant applications submitted by individual countries, ranging from 0-17 during the 24-month survey period. The median number of funded studies per country was 1 (IQR 3, range 0-9) representing a median success rate of 47.1 % (IQR 21.1-59.4%), with no RCTs granted joint European funding. Conclusions Our survey highlights significant inequities in stroke trial funding across Europe. Given the encouraging rate of successful applications overall, it is important for all member networks to submit proposals. This is particularly pertinent for multicentre trials, given the evolution of evidence base in stroke towards large trials, across diverse populations.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.8%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.9%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.4%
4
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
140 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
6
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
7
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
8
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
10
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
11
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
12
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Emergency Medicine Journal
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
17
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
18
Neurosurgery
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
19
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
21
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
22
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
23
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
24
PLOS Medicine
110 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
26
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%