Back

Tissue-aware elastic net decomposition reveals shared and lineage-specific drug response biomarkers

Strauch, J.; Azinfar, L.; Pua, H. H.; Long, J. P.; Coombes, K. R.; Asiaee, A.

2026-06-25 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.21.733619 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Motivation: Computational models that predict cancer drug response from genomic features are central to biomarker discovery, yet a recent audit found data leakage in 72% of 32 published methods, and complex models offer little interpretability while only modestly exceeding simple baselines under honest evaluation. Tissue lineage is a largely untapped source of legitimate inductive bias, but existing tissue-aware methods neither separate pan-cancer from lineage-specific signal nor report leakage-free performance. Results: We introduce the Data Shared Elastic Net (DSEN), a tissue-aware regression that decomposes each drug's model into a shared coefficient block common to all lineages and tissue-specific deviation blocks. Under leakage-free cross-validation across 265 drugs, 1,462 cell lines and 31 tissue lineages, DSEN improved mean squared error over a standard elastic net for 92.5% of drugs (mean 4.95%) while selecting 58% fewer stable shared features. Shared coefficients generalized to held-out tissues (59% tissue-level win rate) and recurrently recovered transferable pathway modules (p53, MAPK), whereas tissue blocks captured lineage markers such as the skin MITF/S100B program. The closest tissue-aware comparator, TG-LASSO, performed worse than the tissue-agnostic baseline (-13.8% mean MSE). Ablation shows tissue-aware modeling helps most when features are scarce, with no single modality dominating.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.