Back

qPCR Guru, a free browser-based platform, strengthens microRNA analyses using full-curve Cq estimation

Singh, A.;Singh, O.;Sarkar, M.;Coultous, R.;Stice, S.

2026-06-23 Molecular Biology
10.64898/2026.06.21.733609 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) depends on reliable quantification cycle (Cq) estimation from amplification curves, which are not always well-behaved. We developed qPCR Guru to provide a complete analysis pipeline including data quality assessment, relative quantification, standard-curve diagnostics, and dual-method Cq evaluation. The latter compares the conventional instrument-derived threshold ("Reported") Cq versus the full-curve five-parameter logistic (5PL) second-derivative-maximum ("Fit") Cq and automatically flags curve-shape abnormalities and disagreement between the two estimates. On high-expressing targets (mRNA and microRNA), the two methods showed strong convergence, confirming general-purpose performance. On low-expressing targets, such as serum microRNA, baseline artifacts and biphasic amplification result in threshold miscalls that standard instrument analysis does not flag. Fit Cq restored replicate-concordant values where Reported Cq split the technical replicates by 17-20 cycles, recovered MIQE-compliant amplification efficiencies lost to biphasic miscalls (from 74% to 102% and 387% to 98%), and lowered within-group variability by 48% and 68% in feline and bovine samples, respectively. Together, these results demonstrate that full-curve estimation, with integrated curve-level diagnostics, strengthens qPCR analyses against threshold miscalls. ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTSO_LIqPCR Guru is a free, browser-based platform that provides a complete analysis pipeline and facilitates side-by-side comparisons of an instruments threshold (Reported) Cq and a full-curve (Fit) Cq, from the five-parameter logistic fitting with second-derivative-maximum (SDM/cpD2). C_LIO_LIFor every well the application automatically flags curve-shape abnormalities and disagreement between the two Cq estimates. C_LIO_LIOn clean, high-expressing mRNA and microRNA targets, the two estimators (Reported Cq and Fit Cq) were strongly concordant and produced equivalent relative quantification with comparable precision. C_LIO_LIIn low-expressing serum microRNA, baseline artifacts and biphasic amplification produced threshold Cq miscalls of up to [~]20 cycles and were detected by curve-shape flags and/or method disagreement. C_LIO_LIThe full-curve Cq estimate recovered replicate-concordant values, restored MIQE-compliant amplification efficiencies, and reduced within-group variability in serum microRNA. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.2%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.5%
3
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 24%
6.9%
4
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 4%
6.4%
5
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
6
RNA Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
7
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
8
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
9
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
10
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
11
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.2%
12
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.8%
13
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
14
Journal of Clinical Virology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
15
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.4%
19
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
20
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.2%
21
BioTechniques
25 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
22
Journal of Virological Methods
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
24
Biology Methods and Protocols
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
26
RNA
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
27
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
30
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%