Back

Stimulus and circuit contributions to the information geometry of neural manifolds

Goedeke, S.; Kautz, J. K.; Leibold, C.

2026-06-25 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.21.733384 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how network connectivity shapes neural representations is central to systems neuroscience. While dimensionality reduction methods uncover low-dimensional manifold structure in population recordings, a rigorous framework connecting manifold geometry to network mechanisms and information encoding remains lacking. We develop a differential geometric approach for analyzing neural manifolds in rate-based recurrent networks receiving tuned feedforward inputs. We derive expressions for the pullback metric of neural manifolds, showing how input tuning curves, feedforward and recurrent synaptic connectivity shape manifold geometry. Critically, we establish that the Fisher information matrix at steady states also has the structure of a pullback metric, directly linking intrinsic manifold geometry to stimulus discriminability and information encoding. For noise with slow temporal correlations propagated through the network, we show that recurrent effects on information geometry cancel: Fisher information depends only on the feedforward connectivity. Thus, feedforward connectivity critically determines representational geometry. As an example, we demonstrate that the representation of space by a module of hexagonal grid cells is approximately isometric for random distribution of grid phases. Moreover, a linear feedforward transformation can map spatially random input tuning curves into a population of hexagonal grid cells, forming a toroidal manifold. Thus, feedforward connectivity alone can generate structured spatial representations without requiring carefully tuned recurrent connectivity or continuous attractor dynamics. Recurrent connectivity, however, is shown to improve stimulus encoding under fast noise, thereby implementing a selective noise reduction.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.5%
2
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 4%
9.4%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 19%
9.4%
4
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.6%
5
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.7%
6
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.7%
7
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.1%
10
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.7%
11
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
13
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
15
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
16
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.6%
17
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.6%
18
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
19
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
20
Cell Systems
201 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
Communications Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
22
Network Neuroscience
126 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
24
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
PNAS Nexus
159 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
28
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
29
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.6%