Back

A Scalable Framework for Species-Resolved Human Gut Microbiome Profiling Using Full-Length 16S rRNA Sequencing

Sarin, P.; Sehgal, P.; Paveri, V.; Rai, S.; Chettri, A.; Bhoyar, R. C.; Karkaryate, R.; Mirza, S.; Gupta, S. S.; Sivasubbu, S.; Parsannanavar, D. J.

2026-06-23 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.21.732309 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The gut microbiota plays a fundamental role in human health, nutrition, immune development, and disease, driving widespread adoption of 16S rRNA gene sequencing for microbial community characterization. Short-read V3-V4 sequencing remains the dominant approach for large-scale microbiome studies; however, interrogation of only a small fraction of the 16S gene limits phylogenetic resolution and frequently restricts biological interpretation at the species level. Although full-length (V1-V9) 16S sequencing has emerged as a promising alternative, comprehensive evaluation of highly multiplexed full-length workflows in complex human gut microbiomes remains limited. Here, we establish and evaluate a full-length 16S framework for species-resolved human gut microbiome profiling. The workflow was assessed using defined microbial communities, technical replicates, and healthy human fecal microbiomes. Full-length sequencing generated highly concordant taxonomic profiles across independent technical workflows and enabled reproducible recovery of complex microbial communities at both genus and species levels. Application to human fecal microbiomes revealed substantial inter-individual heterogeneity together with extensive ASV-level microdiversity, highlighting the ability of full-length sequencing to resolve fine-scale phylogenetic variation within dominant gut-associated taxa. To quantify the analytical gain afforded by full-length sequencing, V3-V4 datasets were computationally reconstructed directly from identical full-length reads, eliminating methodological and biological confounders. While alpha diversity metrics and overall community structure remained highly concordant between approaches, full-length sequencing markedly improved taxonomic resolution, increasing species-level assignment from approximately 20% to 98% and resolving substantial intra-genus diversity within clinically and ecologically relevant genera including Bifidobacterium, Prevotella, Blautia, Enterococcus, and Klebsiella. Collectively, these findings position full-length 16S sequencing as an enabling technology for the next generation of microbiome studies, where species-level resolution can be integrated with large-scale cohort, longitudinal, and population-health investigations.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.1%
2
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
12.5%
3
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.9%
4
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
5
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.4%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
7
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.3%
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.2%
9
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.2%
11
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.4%
13
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
14
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
BMC Microbiology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.5%
17
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.3%
18
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 23%
1.1%
19
Animal Microbiome
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
21
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 39%
0.9%
23
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.8%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.8%
25
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
26
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.8%
27
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
28
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%