Back

Multifactorial tuberculosis severity score for people living with HIV based on the Rand Appropriateness Method

Akpata, R.; Laureillard, D.; Attinsounon, C. A.; Badoum, G.; Veziris, N.; Messou, E.; Blanc, F.-X.; Weiss, L.; Anglaret, X.; Marcy, O.

2026-06-24 hiv aids
10.64898/2026.06.21.26356185 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background In people living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (PLWH), tuberculosis (TB) is the leading cause of death and is often associated with substantial morbidity. Better identifying PLWH with severe forms of TB could help target early interventions to reduce mortality and severe morbidity. Existing TB severity assessment tools may be sub-optimal for assessing disease severity in PLWH, since they incompletely integrate key determinants of disease severity. We aimed to develop a consensus-based TB severity score tailored to PLWH. Methods We developed a multifactorial TB severity score (TBSS) for PLWH using a modified Delphi process with a multidisciplinary group of international TB experts as the second part of a RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method, following a previously published systematic review. Results Eight of 15 invited experts (53%) participated in both Delphi rounds. Of 62 candidate factors, 15 reflecting TB-related characteristics, host-related characteristics as well as characteristics related to both TB and host were rated as having high appropriateness for inclusion in the final TBSS. The total score ranges from 0 (no severity) to 61 (highest severity). Conclusion This study represents a first step towards the development of a multidimensional TB severity assessment tool for PLWH. However, its clinical usefulness, feasibility, and added value compared with existing severity scores remain to be demonstrated through validation studies before routine implementation can be considered. Key words: tuberculosis, HIV, severity.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.8%
2
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 1%
12.1%
3
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.4%
4
BMJ Global Health
113 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.4%
5
JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
6
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.3%
7
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
8
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
9
BMC Health Services Research
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.8%
10
The Lancet Global Health
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
11
Vaccine
203 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.5%
12
Journal of the International AIDS Society
21 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
14
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
15
BMJ Public Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
16
Tropical Medicine and Infectious Disease
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
17
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
18
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Public Health in Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
21
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
22
Infectious Diseases of Poverty
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
Health Science Reports
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
25
Tropical Medicine & International Health
14 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
26
Epidemiology and Infection
89 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
128 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
28
Vaccines
198 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
29
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%