Back

Clinical Evaluation of Automated Self-Operated Transvaginal Ultrasound for Ovarian Stimulation Monitoring

Shavit, T.; Bortoletto, P.; Szychter, J.; Mendel, S.; Corcos, Y.; Petrozza, J.; Prisant, N.

2026-06-24 sexual and reproductive health
10.64898/2026.06.21.26356181 medRxiv
Show abstract

Objective To evaluate the feasibility, safety, patient acceptance, and preliminary clinical relevance of automated self-operated transvaginal ultrasound for ovarian stimulation monitoring. Design Prospective observational pilot study. Subjects Ten women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization or fertility preservation at a single high-volume private IVF center. Exposure Participants performed investigational self-operated transvaginal ultrasound examinations immediately following standard monitoring visits. Patients inserted and stabilized the ultrasound probe while ovarian and endometrial imaging was acquired through controlled motorized probe rotation without real-time anatomical guidance. Main Outcome Measure(s) The primary outcome was feasibility, defined as the generation of evaluable imaging datasets suitable for ovarian stimulation monitoring. Secondary outcomes included bilateral ovarian visualization, procedural safety, patient-reported outcomes, follicular assessment, and agreement of endometrial thickness measurements with standard transvaginal ultrasound. Result(s) Nineteen investigational scan attempts were performed, yielding 18 evaluable datasets (94.7%). Bilateral ovarian visualization was achieved in 16 of 18 evaluable examinations (88.9%), whereas partial ovarian visualization occurred in 2 examinations (11.1%). No adverse events, adverse device effects, vaginal injury, bleeding, or infection were observed. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrated high procedural acceptability, with all participants expressing willingness to reuse the system. Compared with standard transvaginal ultrasound monitoring, investigational self-operated acquisition significantly improved overall examination experience (Wilcoxon p=0.002). Investigational imaging demonstrated clinically relevant agreement with standard transvaginal ultrasound for follicular categorization and endometrial assessment. Counts of follicles [≥]14 mm correlated strongly with mature oocyte recovery for both investigational and standard ultrasound measurements (Spearman {rho}=0.83 and {rho}=0.80, respectively). Endometrial thickness measurements also demonstrated strong correlation between modalities (Spearman {rho}=0.91). Conclusion(s) This prospective pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of automated self-operated transvaginal ultrasound during ovarian stimulation monitoring. Investigational imaging generated clinically relevant monitoring information without observed safety concerns and was associated with high patient acceptance. These findings support further investigation of patient-operated acquisition strategies and standardized imaging workflows in reproductive medicine.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 10%
18.8%
2
Human Reproduction
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
3
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
4
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.9%
5
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 15%
5.6%
6
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
JMIR Formative Research
33 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.9%
8
Biology of Reproduction
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.9%
9
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.7%
12
BMC Medicine
176 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 45%
1.7%
14
Journal of Pathology Informatics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
15
Statistical Methods in Medical Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
16
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.5%
17
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
18
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.1%
19
Sexually Transmitted Infections
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
21
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
PLOS Digital Health
106 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
BMJ Open
601 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
24
Placenta
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%