Back

Changes in hierarchical brain dynamics of rumination following mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression

Dagnino, P. C.; van der Velden, A. M.; Ruhe, H. G.; Kuyken, W.; Kringelbach, M. L.; Vohryzek, J.; Deco, G.

2026-06-23 psychiatry and clinical psychology
10.64898/2026.06.21.26356048 medRxiv
Show abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a leading cause of disability worldwide with risk of onset and recurrence linked to depressive ruminative thought patterns. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT) is an evidence-based treatment for depression that targets the ability to recognise, decenter, and disengage from ruminative thought patterns. Elucidating how MBCT impacts hierarchical brain organisation may be key to understanding the processes by which MBCT can modulate ruminative tendencies. In a randomised controlled functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) trial on individuals with MDD (N=80) before and after MBCT in addition to treatment as usual (TAU), we investigated changes in hierarchical brain organisation during resting-state and rumination. We built whole-brain models to obtain generative connectivity (GEC) matrices per patient and quantified brain hierarchy by measuring the global directedness and regional trophic levels in each GEC, in which greater directedness reflects more directional information flow and less recurrence. Global directedness in MBCT+TAU compared to TAU increased during rumination, with no changes during resting-state. Furthermore, increased regional breadth of hierarchy during rumination was related to improvements in clinical and behavioural outcomes following MBCT+TAU. Increased brain hierarchy during rumination following mindfulness training may be consistent with a shift away from self-reinforcing negative mental loops towards more differentiated and less coupled cognitive and bodily cycles, supporting MBCT's ability to interrupt ruminative processes. Hierarchical brain dynamics may hold promise as a treatment-sensitive marker and a potential mechanism of therapeutic change in MBCT for depression.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Affective Disorders
92 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
21.0%
2
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.3%
3
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.3%
4
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.0%
5
Nature Mental Health
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Molecular Psychiatry
282 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.9%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.6%
8
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
9
Biological Psychiatry
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.3%
12
Journal of Psychiatric Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.3%
13
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
14
Frontiers in Psychiatry
87 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
16
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Acta Neuropsychiatrica
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
18
European Neuropsychopharmacology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
19
Biological Psychiatry Global Open Science
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
20
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.0%
21
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
The British Journal of Psychiatry
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
European Psychiatry
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.6%
25
Psychiatry Research
41 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
26
Neuropsychopharmacology
153 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Journal of Affective Disorders Reports
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%