Back

Simulation of cell-size systems at long timescales with flexible protein structures

Yunas, K.; Singh, A.; Copeland, M. M.; Tytarenko, A. M.; Kundrotas, P. J.; Halfmann, R.; Kasyanov, P. O.; Feinberg, E. A.; Vakser, I. A.

2026-06-22 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.20.733545 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protein behavior inside cells is dominated by the crowded nature of the intracellular environment. Progress in structure determination of proteins and protein complexes, based on advances in Artificial Intelligence, provides an opportunity for structure-based modeling of cellular phenomena. Such modeling at the atomic resolution has been advanced by the traditional simulation techniques, e.g. molecular dynamics. A recently developed docking-based approach implements Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling of intermolecular energy landscapes, offering several orders of magnitude faster simulation protocols. The approach allows addressing much longer trajectories of macromolecular systems in the crowded intracellular environment at atomic resolution. The sampling by design avoids low-probability (high-energy) states, which greatly accelerates the simulation process. A notable feature of this docking-based approach is the rigid body approximation of protein structures. The rigid-body approximation had been the primary direction in the protein docking field up until recent developments in deep learning. The rigid-body approach should be quite robust for the higher energy transient interactions that dominate the highly crowded cellular environment, as they likely involve relatively small conformational change. However, it is less applicable to the low-energy protein-protein complexes, especially those involving flexible regions. We addressed this problem by incorporating AlphaFold3 top models of the protein complexes in the mapping of the intermolecular energy landscape, as representative of the low-energy configurations of the protein assembly. By the nature of the AlphaFold predictions, these models involve appropriate conformational change between unbound and bound structures. These low-energy docking poses are combined with the rigid-body docking predictions that cover the multiplicity of the transient interactions. Such combination directly addresses the conformational flexibility of proteins upon binding along with the multiplicity of the transient protein encounters in the crowded cellular environment. SIGNIFICANCEProtein behavior inside cells is dominated by the crowded nature of intracellular environment. A recently developed approach allowed addressing long simulation trajectories of macromolecular systems in such environment at atomic resolution. A notable feature of this approach is the rigid body approximation in representation of the protein structures, which had been popular in the field up until the recent developments in artificial intelligence. However, such approximation is less applicable to stable protein-protein complexes, especially those involving flexible regions. We addressed this problem head-on by incorporating top deep learning-generated models of protein complexes. The new approach directly accounts for the flexibility of protein structures upon binding, along with the multiplicity of the transient protein encounters in the crowded cellular environment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 1%
18.8%
2
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
3
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
4
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
8.0%
5
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 18%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.7%
9
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.4%
10
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 23%
2.1%
13
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
102 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
15
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.5%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.1%
18
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
19
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
21
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
Structure
193 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
23
Journal of Computational Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
25
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
The European Physical Journal E
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
Quantitative Biology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%