Back

Maternal ranging strategies facilitate offspring social play at energetic cost in the most solitary ape

Jacobson, O. T.; Ashbury, A. M.; Barrett, B. J.; Crofoot, M. C.; Kukofka, P.; Kunz, J. A.; Utami Atmoko, S. S.; Schuppli, C.; Vogel, E. R.; van Schaik, C. P.; van Noordwijk, M. A.

2026-06-22 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.20.733430 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In most vertebrates, social play among peers is considered essential for behavioral development. Yet in solitary species bearing single offspring, opportunities for social play are inherently scarce. Whether mothers of such species actively facilitate play opportunities for their offspring, and at what cost, remains unknown. We used 15 years of behavioral and movement data ([~]30,000 observation hours) from 31 wild Bornean orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus wurmbii) mother-offspring pairs to test whether mothers adjust ranging behavior to increase their offsprings access to play with neighboring peers. Neighboring mothers with similarly aged offspring showed disproportionately high annual overlap in space use, independent of their relatedness or fruit availability. They intensified use of shared areas within existing range boundaries rather than shifting or expanding their ranges, indicating a fine-scaled ranging strategy. Mothers also incurred energetic costs; on days their offspring played with peers, mothers traveled farther and spent less time feeding. Travel distances were also elevated on the days before and after play, with mothers orienting movement toward play partners core areas before play and back toward their own core areas after play. This suggests these encounters are planned and actively pursued over multiple days rather than arising by chance. These findings reveal that orangutan mothers incorporate their infants social needs into daily ranging decisions, at a cost to their own energy budgets. This points toward an underappreciated form of maternal investment and illustrates how the social requirements of development can be met even near the solitary extreme of animal social organization.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.1%
2
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.8%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 18%
6.3%
4
Behavioral Ecology
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.8%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.8%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.5%
7
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.0%
8
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.8%
9
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.8%
10
Animal Behaviour
73 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
72 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
12
Functional Ecology
61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.0%
14
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
15
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.5%
16
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
17
Oecologia
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
18
American Journal of Primatology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
19
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
20
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.6%
22
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
23
Biology Letters
76 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
24
Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
25
Biological Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.1%
26
Journal of Avian Biology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
27
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
28
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
29
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.9%
30
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%