Comparative Evaluation of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Early Prediction of Severe Acute Pancreatitis: A Multi-Model Study Using the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification
stern, N.
Show abstract
**Background:** Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal emergency with a subset of patients progressing to severe acute pancreatitis (SAP), which carries substantial morbidity and mortality. Current clinical severity scores such as BISAP, APACHE II, Ranson, and the Modified CT Severity Index require upon 48 hours of observation before reliable assessment is possible, limiting early triage. Machine learning (ML) approaches using routine admission laboratory values may enable earlier, more accurate prediction. **Methods:** We evaluated 11 models spanning three architectural families classical ML (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting), feedforward deep learning (MLP, Residual MLP, Attention MLP), and recurrent deep learning (LSTM, Stacked LSTM, Bidirectional LSTM, LSTM+Attention, CNN-LSTM) on a Chinese AP cohort of 722 patients (585 severe, 137 mild) labelled according to the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification. Performance was assessed via 5-fold stratified cross-validation using AUC-ROC, F1 score, sensitivity, specificity, and PPV, with decision thresholds optimised for maximal F1. **Results:** Random Forest achieved the highest AUC of 0.877 (F1=0.917, sensitivity=96.8%, PPV=87.1%), followed closely by Gradient Boosting (AUC=0.874, F1=0.918). Classical ML models consistently outperformed deep learning counterparts. CNN-LSTM was the best recurrent model (AUC=0.777) but remained inferior to all classical approaches. LSTM-family models produced AUC values of 0.684-0.777, reflecting the cross-sectional tabular nature of the data. **Conclusions:** Random Forest provides robust, high-sensitivity early prediction of SAP severity using routine admission data. External prospective validation is required before clinical deployment. **Keywords:** acute pancreatitis; severity prediction; machine learning; random forest; deep learning; LSTM; Revised Atlanta Classification; early triage
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Soluble angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 as a prognostic biomarker for disease progression in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 91%
- Transparent and robust Artificial intelligence-driven Electrocardiogram model for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction 90%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prospective validation of clinical deterioration predictive models prior to intensive care unit transfer among patients admitted to acute care cardiology wards 91%
- Age Prediction From 12-lead Electrocardiograms Using Deep Learning: A Comparison of Four Models on a Contemporary, Freely Available Dataset 91%
- External Validation Of A Novel Digital Signature In Continuous Cardiorespiratory Monitoring To Detect Early Respiratory Deterioration Of ICU Patients 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 95%
- A Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Hospital Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients 95%
- An Online Risk Calculator for Rapid Prediction of In-hospital Mortality from COVID-19 Infection 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of predictive patient characteristics for assessing the probability of COVID-19 in-hospital mortality 95%
- Predictability and Stability Testing to Assess Clinical Decision Instrument Performance for Children After Blunt Torso Trauma 92%
- External validation of a paediatric SMART triage model for use in resource limited facilities 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- OASIS+: leveraging machine learning to improve the prognostic accuracy of OASIS severity score for predicting in-hospital mortality 96%
- Optimized Feature Selection and Advanced Machine Learning for Stroke Risk Prediction in Revascularized Coronary Artery Disease Patients 95%
- Prediction of Sepsis Mortality in ICU Patients Using Machine Learning Methods 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.