Back

MISO: A Controlled Ablation of Masking, Initialization, Sampling, and Optimization for Segmentation in Volumetric Electron Microscopy

Kuruba, S.;Stephenson, G.;Kasinath, V.

2026-06-22 Cell Biology
10.64898/2026.06.19.733473 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multi-organelle segmentation in volumetric electron microscopy (vEM) faces several challenges, including severe class imbalance, the presence of small, rare classes, and inconsistent class coverage across crops. While recent work has focused primarily on architectural design, the impact of sampling, loss functions, and masking strategies on training effectiveness remains comparatively underexplored in vEM organelle segmentation. Here, we systematically evaluate sampling strategies, loss configurations, masking approaches, and model families (CNNs and vision transformers) on the CellMap benchmark. Using 289 annotated 3D FIB-SEM crops, we establish a 32-class segmentation benchmark with stratified train, validation, and test splits, and evaluate all the methods under the same training and inference settings. Across controlled ablations, the proposed combination of repeat-factor sampling, Tversky-BCE loss, and masking achieved the strongest rare-class performance, increasing rare-class mean Dice (mDice) from 0.3244 under uniform sampling to 0.3409. This corresponds to an absolute gain of +0.0165 mDice and a 5.1% relative improvement, while preserving comparable performance on common classes. Overall, we find that sampling, loss design, and masking contribute as much to performance variation as the choice of architecture, highlighting the importance of training-recipe design alongside model architecture in vEM organelle segmentation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 7%
8.0%
2
Journal of Structural Biology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.0%
3
Journal of Cell Biology
392 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.4%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 23%
6.8%
5
npj Imaging
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
6
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.9%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.3%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.3%
9
Microscopy and Microanalysis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Microscopy
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
11
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
13
Advanced Intelligent Systems
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
14
Light: Science & Applications
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
15
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.0%
16
ACS Nano
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
17
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
18
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
19
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
20
IUCrJ
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
21
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.1%
22
Cell Reports Methods
165 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
23
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
24
Molecular Biology of the Cell
311 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
25
Nature Biotechnology
172 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Biological Imaging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
27
Life Science Alliance
285 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
28
Small Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
30
Journal of Structural Biology: X
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%