Back

Machine learning evaluation of gene expression-based ALS subtypes across brain and blood tissues

Gomez, E. A.; Al Khleifat, A.; Troakes, C.; Al-Chalabi, A.; Iacoangeli, A.

2026-06-21 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.06.19.733362 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The clinical and molecular heterogeneity observed in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) presents a challenge for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. RNA sequencing of post-mortem brain samples from ALS patients has identified several subtypes with distinct molecular signatures. We sought to evaluate these subtypes across diverse tissues and datasets and assess the feasibility of supervised machine learning models for sample classification. Unsupervised clustering and pathway analysis were performed to confirm the presence of ALS subtypes in motor cortex samples. Three machine learning strategies were then used to create models based on post-mortem motor cortex expression data of 112 people with ALS from the London Neurodegenerative Diseases Brain Bank. These models were subsequently improved through feature selection and evaluated in independent cohorts from motor cortex (n = 257, NYGC ALS Consortium) and blood (n = 96, Macquarie University Neurodegenerative Disease Biobank) samples. Multi-class linear discriminant analysis (LDA) models were then used for subtype classification. Clustering of ALS post-mortem motor cortex samples confirmed the presence of three subtypes: neuroinflammation (ALS-Neu), extracellular matrix organisation and muscle contraction (ALS-OxA), and synaptic and neuropeptide signalling (ALS-SNs). Among all machine learning strategies, random forests produced the most accurate and stable models for binary classification ([~]93% accuracy across the three subtypes). After feature selection, random forest models were able to classify samples from an independent post-mortem motor cortex cohort in their respective subtypes (AUC of [~]0.98 across the three subtypes). When these models were evaluated in blood using LDA, we found consistent clustering patterns, with samples aligning in the same subtype regions of the post-mortem motor cortex samples, with ALS-SNs being the subtype in which samples were classified with the highest confidence (LDA class probability [~]86%). Moreover, classification for this subtype improved when blood samples were collected closer to death. Our findings support the presence of three gene expression-based ALS subtypes in motor cortex samples and the utility of machine learning strategies for subtype classification. We also observed that the subtypes identified in the brain partially match those in the blood, with samples from the late stages of the disease more likely to be correctly predicted into the ALS-SNs cluster. This suggests a longitudinal effect in subtype identification that requires further investigation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 2%
13.5%
3
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.6%
4
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.8%
5
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.4%
6
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.9%
7
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
8
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.2%
9
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
Brain
168 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 44%
1.8%
12
BMC Genomics
406 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.8%
14
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
15
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
16
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
17
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Genes
144 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
NAR Molecular Medicine
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
27
Neurotherapeutics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
29
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%