Back

Cave adaptation drives coordinated transcriptional remodeling across diverse cell types in the brain of a teleost fish

Ricemeyer, E. S.; Gallman, K.; X, M.; Nussbaum, Y.; Carroll, R. A.; Peuss, R.; Rohner, N.; Keene, A. C.; Warren, W. C.

2026-06-24 genomics
10.64898/2026.06.19.733352 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Adaptation of organisms to extreme environments requires dramatic phenotypic changes. Studying these changes can elucidate mechanisms underlying phenotypic differences in the context of both evolution and human disease. The Mexican tetra, Astyanax mexicanus, is a powerful model of extreme adaptation over a short evolutionary time scale. This fish species includes surface- and cave-dwelling ecotypes, with cavefish displaying many adaptations to subterranean life, including behavioral changes such as sleep loss, increased appetite, and reduced aggression. Unraveling the mechanisms underlying these changes has been challenging, presumably because they are complex traits that required coordinated changes across multiple cell types to evolve. Here, we present a spatially integrated comparative cell atlas of whole adult brains of surface and cavefish. After establishing the molecular signatures of 35 cell types, we show that cave colonization drove canalized regulatory changes to gene expression across diverse cell types. Cavefish brains show shifts in cell-type composition compared to their surface counterparts, as well as complex regulatory changes to pathways governing hypoxia response and circadian rhythm. Microglia in the cavefish brain underwent extensive transcriptional remodelling, including changes in senescence and AMPK pathways. Further, cell-cell communication analysis identified a cave-enriched ligand-receptor communication pattern centered on signals sent from glial cells to diverse populations of neurons. This atlas identifies genetic changes associated with neural and behavioral evolution and provides a resource for mechanistic studies examining brain evolution.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 9%
18.2%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
3
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 14%
7.8%
4
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.6%
5
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science
477 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.4%
7
Nature
645 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.3%
8
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.4%
9
Genome Research
468 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
10
Current Biology
665 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.7%
11
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 13%
2.7%
12
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.4%
13
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
BMC Biology
265 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
16
Genome Biology
637 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
17
Developmental Cell
196 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
Molecular Biology and Evolution
542 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Cell Genomics
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
22
Genome Biology and Evolution
338 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
The EMBO Journal
309 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
24
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 79%
0.6%
25
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
26
Nature Ecology & Evolution
18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%