Patterns of molecular conservation along tooth development are only partly shaped by evolutionary pressures on tooth

Although it is well established that certain stages of development are molecularly more conserved than others, the reasons for this phenomenon remain largely unknown. We study molecular conservation in the development of an organ, the molar, by comparing the temporal profiles of expression in mice and hamsters. We find that the cause of conservation of expression and of coding sequences changes over molar development. Gene expression levels display a classical increase of divergence as development progresses. In terms of genes expressed, the composition of early and late stages is better conserved and enriched in pleiotropic genes, yet each stage mobilizes different sets of pleiotropic genes, cell division for bud growth and secretion for tooth mineralization. Moreover similar patterns of higher divergence of gene sets and of coding sequences at mid development, are caused by different biological phenomena, in that case heterochronies and blood colonisation respectively. In conclusion, the patterns of molecular conservation in developing molars are shaped by a combination of processes intrinsic to the teeth, and by negative and positive selection on functions which are mostly extrinsic to the teeth. This is likely translatable to explain molecular conservation patterns in many other biological systems. AUTHOR SUMMARYFor species to evolve different adaptations to different life styles, their anatomy has to evolve correspondingly. This in turn implies evolution of the embryonic development of anatomical structures. Notably, tooth shape can evolve rapidly as an adaptation to different diets. Mice and hamsters are closely related rodents who yet differ in the shape of their molars, and thus in their development. In this study, we investigated why the genes active in molar development are more or less similar between the two species from early tooth bud to fully formed embryo molar. We found that early and late molar development were slow evolving, while mid-development was evolving faster. But surprisingly, this was in part due not to tooth evolution, but to the involvement of genes which are active in other processes in the body. For example an influx of immune cells also brings fast evolving immune genes. This helps us understand better the complexity of causes of apparently simple evolutionary patterns.