Back

UKBAnalytica: an integrated R package for scalable phenotyping and reproducible epidemiological analysis within the UK Biobank Research Analysis Platform

He, N.; Mo, K.; Yu, G.; He, F.

2026-06-22 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.06.19.26356057 medRxiv
Show abstract

UK Biobank provides longitudinal health-related data for approximately 500,000 participants, and its Research Analysis Platform (RAP) has shifted large-scale analyses toward secure cloud-based computation. However, many existing tools address only specific steps of the analytical workflow, leaving a need for an integrated framework that connects multi-source disease phenotyping, survival-ready cohort construction, and downstream analysis on the RAP. Here, we present UKBAnalytica, an extensible R package for scalable phenotyping and integrated analysis of UK Biobank data within the RAP environment. It currently includes 52 predefined baseline variables and a built-in library of 331 curated disease definitions. These definitions are based on multiple UK Biobank data sources, including ICD-10, ICD-9, self-reported conditions, death registry records, algorithmically defined outcomes, and OPCS-4 procedure codes. UKBAnalytica distinguishes prevalent and incident cases, constructs follow-up time, generates analysis-ready survival datasets, and summarizes participant flow. Beyond phenotype construction, UKBAnalytica provides integrated modules for epidemiological analysis, omics analysis, and machine-learning-based modeling and interpretation. By linking endpoint definition with downstream modeling under a consistent data structure, UKBAnalytica reduces repetitive scripting and improves analytical transparency. Furthermore, we demonstrate the package's practical utility through a case study on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) proteomics. The findings align closely with previously reported conclusions, underscoring the robustness and reliability of our analytical framework. This phenotype-centered framework complements existing UK Biobank tools and facilitates reproducible RAP-based biomedical research. UKBAnalytica is freely available at https://github.com/Hinna0818/UKBAnalytica.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 14%
12.8%
2
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
9.8%
3
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
242 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
6
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.5%
7
Database
61 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.5%
9
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.5%
11
Genetic Epidemiology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
npj Digital Medicine
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
BMC Medical Genomics
50 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
14
Molecular Systems Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
European Journal of Epidemiology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
16
Journal of Proteome Research
234 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
18
American Journal of Epidemiology
67 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
19
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
20
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
21
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
22
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
23
Journal of Translational Medicine
57 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
24
BMC Research Notes
33 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
25
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
26
Nature Medicine
125 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.8%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 33%
0.6%
30
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%