Back

Subtle language deficits in WAB-recovered patients at 12 months after left-hemisphere stroke

Marte, M. J.; Chaves, M.; Kelly, L.; Diaz-Carr, I.; Neal, V.; Faria, A. V.; Stockbridge, M. D.; Hillis, A. E.

2026-06-22 neurology
10.64898/2026.06.19.26356022 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: The Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) Aphasia Quotient is the most widely used standardized post-stroke aphasia measure; its conventional 93.8 cutoff has limited sensitivity to mild residual impairment. Beyond the cutoff, it offers limited objective discourse assessment, no action-naming assessment, and naming tests limited to very common objects. Aims: We sought short tests capturing subtle aphasia in patients recovered above the WAB-R threshold, then its demographic and lesion correlates. Methods & Procedures: Sixty-seven patients with acute left-hemisphere ischemic stroke completed acute structural MRI and a 12-month language battery comprising the WAB-R, Boston Naming Test (BNT), Hopkins Action Naming Assessment (HANA), and Modern Cookie Theft (MCT) picture description. Hierarchical logistic (binary deficit) and linear (control-referenced composite z-score) regressions evaluated acute aphasia history, sex, education, age, acute depression (PHQ-9), and residualized regional lesion load. Outcomes & Results: Of 67 participants, 45 (67%) recovered above the WAB-R threshold. Of these, 18 (40%) had residual deficits on at least one supplemental test ("subtle aphasia"). BNT plus MCT content-unit count captured all 18 (100%); HANA added none beyond these two. The binary model discriminated deficit from no-deficit at AUC = 0.80 (95% CI [0.70, 1.00]); higher education significantly lowered deficit odds (OR = 0.80/year, 95% CI [0.64, 1.00], p = .049). On the continuous composite, acute PHQ-9 independently predicted 12-month outcome ({beta} = -0.13 per point, 95% CI [-0.22, -0.04], p = .006, cumulative R-squared = 0.38). Applying the Senthilkumar et al. (2026) stricter cutoff (WAB-AQ [≥] 96.7) reclassified 12 of 45 (27%) out of recovery, capturing 8 of 18 (44%) subtle-aphasia patients. Composite residualized lesion load did not differentiate the groups when adjusted. Conclusions: Above the WAB-R recovery threshold, subtle aphasia is present on the BNT or MCT in ~40%, with higher education associated with lower odds at 12 months; acute depression emerged as a candidate correlate but did not survive removal of a single high-influence observation, warranting replication in larger samples. Regional lesion variables informative at greater stroke severity contribute little as large lesions cluster in the persistently aphasic group, reducing lesion variance within the recovered subgroup and its discrimination of subtle deficits. This adds to evidence that clinicians should not infer complete language recovery from the WAB-AQ alone, and that identifying residual deficits may require greater investment in behavioral assessment and consideration of alternative WAB-AQ cutoffs. Structural anatomical information, by contrast, appears to add little discriminative value at the upper performance range.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Neurology
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.9%
2
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.9%
3
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
Frontiers in Neurology
102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
7.9%
5
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.2%
6
Stroke
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.5%
50% of probability mass above
7
Brain Sciences
55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.7%
8
Journal of Neurology
28 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
9
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
NeuroImage: Reports
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
11
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
12
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.7%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.7%
15
Neuropsychologia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
16
Brain and Behavior
43 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.4%
17
Cortex
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
Clinical Neurophysiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
19
European Journal of Neurology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
BMC Neurology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
21
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
30 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Brain Structure and Function
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
26
Psychological Medicine
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
Brain Imaging and Behavior
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
28
Disability and Rehabilitation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
29
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
50 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%