Back

Holotomography reveals biophysical remodeling of mouse oocytes during post-ovulatory aging

Kim, M.;Lee, C.;Do, J.;Shin, T.;Iliev, D.;Choi, K.;Shin, S.;Ko, J.;Popa, T.;Hickman, C.;Kim, J.;Park, Y.

2026-06-19 Developmental Biology
10.64898/2026.06.18.733271 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Routine assessment of oocyte state in reproductive biology and clinical embryology still relies largely on two-dimensional transmitted-light morphology, leaving the underlying three-dimensional intracellular organization largely unmeasured. Here, we use holotomography to reconstruct volumetric refractive index (RI) distributions in unlabeled live mouse oocytes and combine this imaging with sparse-annotation, AI-assisted compartment segmentation and multidimensional feature extraction across geometry, RI statistics, dry-mass density, and intracellular texture. Applied to an in vitro model of post-ovulatory aging, holotomography-derived biophysical profiles separated fresh and aged oocytes more strongly than two-dimensional brightfield-derived features, and feature-family ablation indicated that non-morphological descriptors contributed substantially to this separation. At the population level, aged oocytes showed coordinated ooplasmic remodeling, including reduced volume, increased RI heterogeneity, and increased dry-mass density while total dry mass was broadly conserved. These findings demonstrate a label-free quantitative framework for detecting post-ovulatory aging-associated biophysical remodeling in intact mammalian oocytes. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=167 SRC="FIGDIR/small/733271v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (89K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c7257aorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6d92f0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1c9f7eborg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@b36637_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.