Back

Oxidative stress reshapes diatom-microbiome interactions by shifting benefits from mutualistic to opportunistic bacteria

Ankrah, N.; Swink, C.; McCall, N.; Rolison, K.; Ramon, C.; Weber, P. K.; Stuart, R.; Mayali, X.

2026-06-18 microbiology
10.64898/2026.06.18.733249 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The roles of reactive oxygen species (ROS) as signaling molecules and inhibitors of phytoplankton growth are well documented. While phytoplankton physiological mechanisms for ROS detoxification are well characterized, the role of heterotrophic bacterial partners in ROS alleviation and outcomes for these bacteria remain poorly understood. Here, we examined how extracellular hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) shapes nutrient exchange between the diatom Phaeodactylum tricornutum and two phycosphere bacteria. From an initial screen of 20 bacteria, we identified a "helper" (Muricauda sp.) that enabled P. tricornutum to survive acute H2O2 stress and a "non-helper" (Algoriphagus sp.) that did not. Using nanoscale secondary ion mass spectrometry (nanoSIMS), we tracked diatom-derived carbon and nitrogen (13C and 15N) transfer to each bacterial partner under ROS stress. Oxidative stress disrupted diatom metabolism and altered nutrient transfer: diatom-derived carbon and nitrogen incorporation was significantly reduced in the helper but increased in the non-helper under H2O2 stress. Growth assays revealed that the helper preferentially utilized exudates from healthy, intact hosts, whereas the non-helper did not grow on exudates but thrived on lysates from damaged or lysed cells. Together, these findings indicate the helper was better adapted to accessing resources from living hosts, while the non-helper relied on nutrients released through ROS-induced host damage. Our results highlight oxidative stress as a key driver of algal-bacterial interactions and suggest that bacterial resource-acquisition strategy underlies host protection: bacteria utilizing healthy-host exudates are more likely to protect hosts from oxidative stress, while those benefiting from host damage are not, despite retaining ROS detoxification capacity.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.9%
2
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.8%
3
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.4%
50% of probability mass above
4
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 3%
5.4%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 17%
3.2%
6
Limnology and Oceanography
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
7
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
8
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.1%
9
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.0%
10
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.9%
12
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Environmental Microbiology Reports
31 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.7%
15
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 46%
1.7%
16
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
17
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 59%
1.5%
18
New Phytologist
346 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.0%
20
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Bacteriology
212 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
22
npj Biofilms and Microbiomes
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
25
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%