Back

PIGMENT: A deep learning framework for Porcine Immunohistochemistry seGMENTation

Ambastha, P.; Dadashkarimi, J.; Annavazala, S. K. C.; Parker, D.; Diaz-Arrastia, R.; Song, H.; Smith, D. H.; Dolle, J.-P.; Johnson, V. E.; Wolf, J. A.; Verma, R.

2026-06-23 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.06.18.733245 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traumatic brain injury produces widespread axonal damage can be assessed histologically using amyloid precursor protein (APP) immunohistochemistry, which labels injured axonal profiles at cellular resolution [1, 2]. However, quantification of APP pathology remains a major bottleneck: annotation is manual, time-consuming, spatially localized, and variable across raters, limiting scalability and reproducibility. This limitation is particularly important in studies that use histology as a reference for neuroimaging or other tissue-level measurements, where cellular APP pathology must be quantified in a spatial form that can be aligned with imaging abnormalities. Here, we introduce PIGMENT, an annotation-efficient deep-learning framework for automated segmentation and quantification of APP-positive pathology in porcine white matter histology. PIGMENT uses a compact SegFormer-B0 architecture trained on 525 expert-annotated 512 x 512-pixel tiles from four APP-stained sections across three pigs. Because APP-positive profiles are sparse, fragmented, stain-variable, and morphologically diverse, PIGMENT combines limited expert labels with APP-specific augmentation designed to model variation in APP-positive intensity, size, continuity, fragmentation, and local tissue context. We evaluated PIGMENT using an instance-level detection rate that measures whether discrete APP-positive components are localized. Across held-out APP-stained data, PIGMENT achieved a mean instance-level detection rate of 0.86. Across the configurations tested, the highest mean detection rate was achieved by a training set that included sections from different animals, suggesting that annotation diversity may be an important factor under limited-label conditions. By extending limited high-confidence expert annotations into whole-section APP burden maps, PIGMENT provides a scalable framework for characterizing the extent and spatial distribution of traumatic axonal injury. These maps may support future studies that align histological injury burden with imaging-derived measures.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Imaging Neuroscience
282 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
15.2%
2
Human Brain Mapping
329 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.9%
3
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 2%
7.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 10%
6.8%
5
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
122 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.2%
7
NeuroImage: Clinical
144 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
Neuroinformatics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
9
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.7%
10
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 43%
1.9%
11
Scientific Data
209 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
41 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Brain Informatics
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
15
Brain Communications
166 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
17
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.4%
18
Cerebral Cortex
396 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
19
Aperture Neuro
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
20
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
21
Biomedical Optics Express
95 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.1%
22
npj Parkinson's Disease
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
23
Acta Neuropathologica Communications
89 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
24
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
25
Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
Neurophotonics
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
27
Medical Image Analysis
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
28
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
29
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
30
Alzheimer's & Dementia
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%