Back

Multidomain triple target capture for navigating complex symbioses

Giram, P.; Ahmed, S.; Pantinople, D. J.; Jordan, H. R.; Folk, R. A.

2026-06-19 ecology
10.64898/2026.06.18.733235 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Amplicon sequencing remains the benchmark technique for characterizing microbial communities, but the limitations of PCR bias and single-locus targets conspire to limit conclusions. Metagenomics, the primary alternative, shares with amplicon sequencing challenges of economic scaling at adequate sequencing depth. Targeted enrichment strategies can improve the data resolution and economics of sequencing efforts while reducing methodological bias. Here, we develop a target capture strategy for metagenomic characterization of eukaryotic ribosomal DNA and root nodule symbiosis genes and test it in the metagenomes of plant root nodules. We utilize biotinylated RNA probes to selectively capture genomic regions of interest from complex environmental DNA samples, avoiding forms of PCR bias that can undermine community characterization and overcoming the need for conserved priming sites often lacking in functional genes. We designed custom probe sets targeting conserved flanking regions of eukaryotic ITS and known root nodule symbiosis (RNS)-related genes and tested them on diverse root nodule metagenomes and a mock community. We observed high recovery of target loci from samples, very high on-target read proportions, and enhanced detection of low-abundance taxa compared to amplicon sequencing, including stronger alignment with known mock community compositions. This approach will enable deeper insights into the phylogenetic diversity of eukaryotic symbionts, their genomic adaptations, and the functional potential of symbiotic interactions in a cost-effective manner suitable for large-scale projects. This strategy advances our understanding of microbial community dynamics and symbiotic relationships in natural and anthropogenic ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.3%
2
ISME Communications
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
3
mSystems
394 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
9.9%
4
Molecular Ecology Resources
171 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
5
The ISME Journal
228 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
5.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 20%
4.9%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 35%
3.6%
8
Environmental Microbiology
133 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
9
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
339 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
Microbiome
154 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.3%
11
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.2%
12
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
13
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 48%
1.8%
14
Frontiers in Microbiology
427 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
15
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
16
Nature Methods
385 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
17
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
18
Cell
431 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.1%
19
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
20
Nature Microbiology
155 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
21
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.0%
22
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
23
Molecular Ecology
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
25
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.9%
26
Environmental Science & Technology
64 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
mSphere
302 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
29
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.6%