Back

Defining reversible binding rates in 1D systems dependent on diffusion, density, and excluded volume

Sang, M.; Johnson, M. E.

2026-06-20 biophysics
10.64898/2026.06.18.733157 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Binding reactions in effectively one-dimensional systems, such as proteins diffusing along DNA or other filaments, pose a fundamental coarse-graining challenge because stochastic trajectories are recurrent in one dimension and therefore do not admit a unique, separation-independent macroscopic association rate. As a result, continuum rate equations are not exact in 1D even for initially homogeneous systems. Here we develop a practical framework for mapping stochastic 1D reaction-diffusion dynamics onto effective kinetic models. Using mean-first-passage arguments and particle-based simulations, we define a density-dependent association rate and a corresponding single-rate approximation, and quantify when each provides an accurate description of the underlying stochastic dynamics. We implement 1D reaction-diffusion with excluded volume in the NERDSS software using a free-propagator reweighting algorithm and validate it against known pairwise and many-body limits. Our results show that ordinary rate equations with a single effective rate can accurately reproduce 1D reaction kinetics when the dimensionless parameter governing the ratio of intrinsic to diffusion-limited reactivity is small, with excellent agreement in the strongly rate-limited regime and increasing deviations as diffusion control strengthens. We further show that excluded volume in 1D can appreciably alter both kinetics and equilibrium populations, even at modest particle densities, by reducing accessible length and introducing blockade effects. Together, these results provide quantitative guidance for selecting between spatial simulations, density-dependent rate models, and single-rate continuum descriptions of reversible 1D binding reactions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Chemical Physics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
18.8%
3
Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
140 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.0%
4
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.8%
50% of probability mass above
5
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.3%
7
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
9
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
10
Physical Biology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.5%
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.2%
12
Journal of Theoretical Biology
162 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 49%
1.7%
14
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
15
Bulletin of Mathematical Biology
92 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
16
Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
17
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
Biophysical Reports
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
19
Journal of Computational Chemistry
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
20
Soft Matter
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
21
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 59%
0.6%