Back

Nanovibrational stimulation preferentially enhances osteogenic responses in zebrafish

Adigun, O.; Wang, M.; Williams, J. A.; Zappia, J.; Dobre, O. A.; Maung, M.; Reid, S.; Childs, P. G.; Moss, J. J.; Hammond, C. L.

2026-06-19 physiology
10.64898/2026.06.18.733105 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mechanical cues are key regulators of bone formation, yet their potential as therapeutic stimuli remains incompletely explored in vivo. Nanovibrational stimulation, which delivers low-amplitude, high-frequency mechanical input, has been shown to promote osteogenic differentiation in vitro, and rodent studies have similarly demonstrated osteogenic effects. However, its impact on other cellular systems at the whole-organism level remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that nanovibrational stimulation enhances myogenic differentiation in vitro before investigating its effects on skeletal development and tissue specificity in zebrafish. Larval zebrafish exposed to nanovibrational stimulation exhibited increased osteoblast numbers and enhanced bone formation relative to controls. In adult zebrafish, nanovibration increased the osteoblast response to a fracture-like injury, indicating enhanced osteogenic activity during repair. To assess tissue specificity, we examined additional cell types and systems relevant to skeletal regeneration, including cartilage, muscle, vasculature and innate immune cells. Although nanovibrational stimulation promoted myogenic differentiation of C2C12 cells in vitro, its effects on muscle and other non-skeletal tissues in zebrafish larvae were comparatively limited. These findings suggest that nanovibrational stimulation exerts a preferential effect on osteogenic processes in vivo. These findings demonstrate that nanovibrational stimulation preferentially enhances osteoblast-mediated bone formation and skeletal injury responses in zebrafish, without causing significant perturbations in other tissues. Our results establish zebrafish as a tractable in vivo model for investigating vibration-induced mechanobiological processes, providing a more physiologically relevant representation of tissue-level mechanotransduction than conventional two-dimensional culture systems. Furthermore, these findings highlight the potential of nanovibrational stimulation as a non-invasive strategy to promote bone regeneration and fracture repair.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
2
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
3
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 29%
5.1%
5
npj Microgravity
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Journal of Orthopaedic Research
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
The Journal of Experimental Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
8
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
9
American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.2%
10
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
50% of probability mass above
11
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 38%
2.7%
12
Experimental Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
13
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 43%
2.4%
14
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 15%
2.4%
15
Science Translational Medicine
127 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
16
Journal of General Physiology
60 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
17
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
18
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
19
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
20
Journal of Applied Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
21
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.5%
22
Advanced Science
286 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
23
The Journal of Physiology
150 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 27%
1.1%
25
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
26
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
27
Journal of Cell Science
393 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
28
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
233 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
29
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
30
Disease Models & Mechanisms
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%